Scholarlink

Background <p>Traditional approaches in medical ethics have primarily focused on the consequences of diagnoses, emphasizing their impact on patients’ lives, treatment options, and social perception. While this perspective remains indispensable, it is limited in its consideration of the conditions under which diagnostic categories are created and applied. However, understanding these processes is essential, as they shape not only individual patient experiences but also broader social norms and the framework conditions of health systems.</p> Methods <p>Drawing on Michel Foucault’s work, this paper examines the intersection between epistemic authority and ethics in the production of medical knowledge. Foucault’s analyses of medicine reveal how diagnostic practices are not purely objective but are embedded in institutional frameworks that regulate the production and application of medical knowledge. This perspective resonates with recent discussions in medical ethics such as epistemic injustice. However, as these often converge with Foucault’s ideas, his work provides a suitable basis for a comprehensive examination of the way in which diagnoses are handled.</p> Results <p>Diagnoses are not merely neutral descriptions of objective biological phenomena, but emerge from specific epistemic and institutional frameworks that structure medical knowledge. A Foucauldian lens allows for the formulation of critical questions that encourage a shift in perspective, from evaluating only the consequences of diagnoses to interrogating the processes that produce and validate them. This approach highlights the ethical significance of medical epistemology itself and its influence on patient care, social norms, and health governance.</p> Conclusions <p>Ethical analysis in medicine must extend beyond the immediate effects of diagnosis. Attention to the production and structuring of medical knowledge is necessary to fully understand how diagnoses influence patients’ experiences, shape social expectations, and reinforce systems of power. With the help of a Foucauldian Shift, medical ethics can more comprehensively address the moral dimensions of diagnosis, moving from consequences to the broader conditions that generate them.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Reconceptualizing the ethics of diagnosis: a Foucauldian framework

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年8月3日

查看全文
  • Antonia Sahm

摘要

Background

Traditional approaches in medical ethics have primarily focused on the consequences of diagnoses, emphasizing their impact on patients’ lives, treatment options, and social perception. While this perspective remains indispensable, it is limited in its consideration of the conditions under which diagnostic categories are created and applied. However, understanding these processes is essential, as they shape not only individual patient experiences but also broader social norms and the framework conditions of health systems.

Methods

Drawing on Michel Foucault’s work, this paper examines the intersection between epistemic authority and ethics in the production of medical knowledge. Foucault’s analyses of medicine reveal how diagnostic practices are not purely objective but are embedded in institutional frameworks that regulate the production and application of medical knowledge. This perspective resonates with recent discussions in medical ethics such as epistemic injustice. However, as these often converge with Foucault’s ideas, his work provides a suitable basis for a comprehensive examination of the way in which diagnoses are handled.

Results

Diagnoses are not merely neutral descriptions of objective biological phenomena, but emerge from specific epistemic and institutional frameworks that structure medical knowledge. A Foucauldian lens allows for the formulation of critical questions that encourage a shift in perspective, from evaluating only the consequences of diagnoses to interrogating the processes that produce and validate them. This approach highlights the ethical significance of medical epistemology itself and its influence on patient care, social norms, and health governance.

Conclusions

Ethical analysis in medicine must extend beyond the immediate effects of diagnosis. Attention to the production and structuring of medical knowledge is necessary to fully understand how diagnoses influence patients’ experiences, shape social expectations, and reinforce systems of power. With the help of a Foucauldian Shift, medical ethics can more comprehensively address the moral dimensions of diagnosis, moving from consequences to the broader conditions that generate them.