Scholarlink

Study design <p>We conducted a prospective cohort study comparing interobserver reliability of 2 different 3D scanning measurement methods following dermal filler therapy in oral cleft patients.</p> Objective of the study <p>The objective of the study was to compare the interobserver reliability of 2 different assessment methods of 3D facial scan data.</p> Methods <p>We studied 10 oral-cleft patients prospectively who underwent dermal filler therapy in the oral region by a single oral-surgeon using a modified injecting technique with 27 gauge 25 mm micro-cannula between 2021 and 2023. 3D facial scans were made before the treatment procedure and during follow-up visits and were used for analysis. The interbody fusion was scored on these 3D images using the 2 classification systems (Method 1, Method 2) by 3 experienced orthodontic specialists all of whom were blinded to clinical data and outcome.</p> Results <p>Of the 2 classifications included in the current study, all classifications had a high interobserver agreement.</p> Conclusion <p>The 2 assessment methods used in this study showed high interobserver reliability so we can conclude that, the applied methods may provide as a validation in the outcome of dermal filler therapy. However, we suggest that further refinements may be required to achieve a reliable and consistent assessment of 3D facial scan analysis after dermal filler therapy in oral cleft patients.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Interobserver reliability in the 3D facial scan assessment of the outcome in dermal filler therapy

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年11月29日

查看全文
  • Anna Vadasz,
  • Mate Vlocsko,
  • Tamas Tarjanyi,
  • Ferenc Rarosi,
  • Tamas Vereb,
  • Anna Lili Zicsi-Liess,
  • Laszlo Hegedus,
  • Veronika Agnes Jancsik,
  • Jozsef Piffko

摘要

Study design

We conducted a prospective cohort study comparing interobserver reliability of 2 different 3D scanning measurement methods following dermal filler therapy in oral cleft patients.

Objective of the study

The objective of the study was to compare the interobserver reliability of 2 different assessment methods of 3D facial scan data.

Methods

We studied 10 oral-cleft patients prospectively who underwent dermal filler therapy in the oral region by a single oral-surgeon using a modified injecting technique with 27 gauge 25 mm micro-cannula between 2021 and 2023. 3D facial scans were made before the treatment procedure and during follow-up visits and were used for analysis. The interbody fusion was scored on these 3D images using the 2 classification systems (Method 1, Method 2) by 3 experienced orthodontic specialists all of whom were blinded to clinical data and outcome.

Results

Of the 2 classifications included in the current study, all classifications had a high interobserver agreement.

Conclusion

The 2 assessment methods used in this study showed high interobserver reliability so we can conclude that, the applied methods may provide as a validation in the outcome of dermal filler therapy. However, we suggest that further refinements may be required to achieve a reliable and consistent assessment of 3D facial scan analysis after dermal filler therapy in oral cleft patients.