Background <p>Weeds, which have long seen as nutrient competitors for crops, have made chemical weeding mainstream in agriculture. However, in Guangxi’s Longsheng Terraces, a global agricultural heritage site, the Zhuang, Yao and Dong peoples value them as medicine, food, feed and even tools. This undocumented traditional knowledge, under chemical agriculture and tourism pressures, is on the verge of extinction.</p> Methods <p>This study integrates research methods from ethnobotany and weed science and conducts a survey on weed species across 11 types of farmlands, including paddy fields and corn fields in the Longsheng Terraces. It focuses on traditional knowledge of weed utilization among the Zhuang, Yao, and Dong ethnic groups. A total of 36 key informants were recruited using snowball sampling supplemented by referrals from local government agencies. Through semi-structured interviews, data on the local names, uses, utilized parts, and frequency of use of these weeds were recorded. Additionally, indicators such as frequency of citation (FC), informant consensus factor (FIC) and use value (UV) were employed to analyze their value quantitatively.</p> Results <p>A total of 49 weed species feature traditional utilization value, covering four major categories: medicinal use (41 species, accounting for 81.6%), edible, forage, and tool material use. Among them, <i>Polygonum hydropiper</i>, <i>Plantago asiatica</i>, <i>Lygodium microphyllum</i>, <i>Actinidia chinensis</i>, and <i>Boehmeria nivea</i> had the highest use value. In terms of usage consensus, there was a high level of consensus within the community regarding weed utilization knowledge for conditions such as coryza and snake bites. Notably, 29 medicinal weeds have not been recorded in the <i>Pharmacopoeia of the People’s Republic of China</i>. Among the 14 medicinal weeds that are included in the Pharmacopoeia, the uses of nine species remain unrecorded, which indicates that these weeds have potential development value. Analysis of ethnic differences revealed that the Yao ethnic group utilized the most abundant weed species, followed by the Zhuang and the Dong. The similarity coefficient analysis revealed that the Zhuang and Yao ethnic groups presented the highest similarity in weed utilization knowledge, whereas the similarity between the Zhuang and Dong ethnic groups was the lowest. The inheritance of traditional knowledge showed a significant intergenerational decreasing trend, with no gender difference observed. Additionally, the impact of tourism development on the weed utilization rate did not reach statistical significance.</p> Conclusions <p>This study reveals the multidimensional value of weeds in the Longsheng Terraces and the traditional ecological wisdom they embody, providing significant reference values for biodiversity conservation, traditional knowledge inheritance, and sustainable agricultural development at global agricultural cultural heritage sites. Moreover, systematic research and protective measures are needed to prevent the loss of these valuable resources due to improper management.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Traditional utilization of weeds and ethnic ecological wisdom in Longsheng terraces—a study based on globally important agricultural heritage systems

  • Wanli Ma,
  • Yu Zeng,
  • Jiurun Zhou,
  • Renchuan Hu,
  • Haiou Liu,
  • Yujing Liu

摘要

Background

Weeds, which have long seen as nutrient competitors for crops, have made chemical weeding mainstream in agriculture. However, in Guangxi’s Longsheng Terraces, a global agricultural heritage site, the Zhuang, Yao and Dong peoples value them as medicine, food, feed and even tools. This undocumented traditional knowledge, under chemical agriculture and tourism pressures, is on the verge of extinction.

Methods

This study integrates research methods from ethnobotany and weed science and conducts a survey on weed species across 11 types of farmlands, including paddy fields and corn fields in the Longsheng Terraces. It focuses on traditional knowledge of weed utilization among the Zhuang, Yao, and Dong ethnic groups. A total of 36 key informants were recruited using snowball sampling supplemented by referrals from local government agencies. Through semi-structured interviews, data on the local names, uses, utilized parts, and frequency of use of these weeds were recorded. Additionally, indicators such as frequency of citation (FC), informant consensus factor (FIC) and use value (UV) were employed to analyze their value quantitatively.

Results

A total of 49 weed species feature traditional utilization value, covering four major categories: medicinal use (41 species, accounting for 81.6%), edible, forage, and tool material use. Among them, Polygonum hydropiper, Plantago asiatica, Lygodium microphyllum, Actinidia chinensis, and Boehmeria nivea had the highest use value. In terms of usage consensus, there was a high level of consensus within the community regarding weed utilization knowledge for conditions such as coryza and snake bites. Notably, 29 medicinal weeds have not been recorded in the Pharmacopoeia of the People’s Republic of China. Among the 14 medicinal weeds that are included in the Pharmacopoeia, the uses of nine species remain unrecorded, which indicates that these weeds have potential development value. Analysis of ethnic differences revealed that the Yao ethnic group utilized the most abundant weed species, followed by the Zhuang and the Dong. The similarity coefficient analysis revealed that the Zhuang and Yao ethnic groups presented the highest similarity in weed utilization knowledge, whereas the similarity between the Zhuang and Dong ethnic groups was the lowest. The inheritance of traditional knowledge showed a significant intergenerational decreasing trend, with no gender difference observed. Additionally, the impact of tourism development on the weed utilization rate did not reach statistical significance.

Conclusions

This study reveals the multidimensional value of weeds in the Longsheng Terraces and the traditional ecological wisdom they embody, providing significant reference values for biodiversity conservation, traditional knowledge inheritance, and sustainable agricultural development at global agricultural cultural heritage sites. Moreover, systematic research and protective measures are needed to prevent the loss of these valuable resources due to improper management.