Scholarlink

Background <p>Contemporary conditions require detailed study of internationalisation. This article offers a novel perspective on processes of internationalisation in healthcare, adapting an approach from higher education studies and enhancing it with insights from sociological scholarship on moral economies. The article asks how institutions and individuals respond to the globalising healthcare environment, and what this reveals about normative questions that govern healthcare provisioning in national contexts. This is pursued using qualitative data from a study on international commercial services in the English National Health Service (NHS).</p> Results <p>The findings of the research demonstrate how the UK government has sought to build political consensus around specific (commodified) forms of internationalisation in a context of fiscal austerity and xenophobia surrounding the provision of public services. The English NHS has been politically re-imagined as world-leading and of interest as an export industry. Study findings show this stance is premised normatively on processes of subsidy between two apparently distinct spheres – from international (private) to national (public) – but that in practice the distinction is hazy and subsidy at times indirect, routed to individual staff members or to commercial teams. The ascendancy of this as a prevailing, politically legitimate form of internationalisation for the English NHS contrasts sharply with non-commodified alternatives decried as ‘health tourism’.</p> Conclusions <p>The internationalisation framework presented in this article offers a platform for future research that can shed light on the contexts, visions, policies and contestations the emerge as healthcare institutions respond to processes of globalisation. It will be important to avoid uncritical approaches to research and policy by examining not just what forms of internationalisation find favour, and their basis in geographical and racialised hierarchies, but also how approaches to healthcare internationalisation impact inequalities within and between nations.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Internationalisation and moral economies in healthcare: NHS exporting and the English patient

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年6月13日

查看全文
  • Benjamin M. Hunter

摘要

Background

Contemporary conditions require detailed study of internationalisation. This article offers a novel perspective on processes of internationalisation in healthcare, adapting an approach from higher education studies and enhancing it with insights from sociological scholarship on moral economies. The article asks how institutions and individuals respond to the globalising healthcare environment, and what this reveals about normative questions that govern healthcare provisioning in national contexts. This is pursued using qualitative data from a study on international commercial services in the English National Health Service (NHS).

Results

The findings of the research demonstrate how the UK government has sought to build political consensus around specific (commodified) forms of internationalisation in a context of fiscal austerity and xenophobia surrounding the provision of public services. The English NHS has been politically re-imagined as world-leading and of interest as an export industry. Study findings show this stance is premised normatively on processes of subsidy between two apparently distinct spheres – from international (private) to national (public) – but that in practice the distinction is hazy and subsidy at times indirect, routed to individual staff members or to commercial teams. The ascendancy of this as a prevailing, politically legitimate form of internationalisation for the English NHS contrasts sharply with non-commodified alternatives decried as ‘health tourism’.

Conclusions

The internationalisation framework presented in this article offers a platform for future research that can shed light on the contexts, visions, policies and contestations the emerge as healthcare institutions respond to processes of globalisation. It will be important to avoid uncritical approaches to research and policy by examining not just what forms of internationalisation find favour, and their basis in geographical and racialised hierarchies, but also how approaches to healthcare internationalisation impact inequalities within and between nations.