<p>Growing research highlights interpretation inflexibility as a key transdiagnostic mechanism across psychopathologies. Yet, few studies have examined its role in everyday socio-emotional processing. This review bridges that gap by exploring how interpretation inflexibility contributes to psychopathology—particularly depression and psychosis—in social contexts. Evidence suggests disrupted interpersonal processes, including rigid interpretations of social scenarios and impressions of others, are central to understanding depressive and psychotic symptoms. Depression is marked by valence-specific, context-dependent inflexibility, with difficulty disengaging from negative biases. In contrast, psychosis shows a broader inflexibility across emotional valences. The review also outlines evolving measures of interpretation inflexibility, emphasizing the need to account for social context in interpretation revision. Current findings highlight the value of examining inflexibility within social frameworks to better understand its role in adaptive functioning and psychopathology. Future research on interpretation inflexibility in social contexts could inform novel interventions and improve clinical outcomes.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Examining clinical relevance of interpretation inflexibility in social contexts

  • Wisteria Deng,
  • Reut Zabag,
  • Saumya Narain,
  • Tyrone D. Cannon,
  • Jutta Joormann

摘要

Growing research highlights interpretation inflexibility as a key transdiagnostic mechanism across psychopathologies. Yet, few studies have examined its role in everyday socio-emotional processing. This review bridges that gap by exploring how interpretation inflexibility contributes to psychopathology—particularly depression and psychosis—in social contexts. Evidence suggests disrupted interpersonal processes, including rigid interpretations of social scenarios and impressions of others, are central to understanding depressive and psychotic symptoms. Depression is marked by valence-specific, context-dependent inflexibility, with difficulty disengaging from negative biases. In contrast, psychosis shows a broader inflexibility across emotional valences. The review also outlines evolving measures of interpretation inflexibility, emphasizing the need to account for social context in interpretation revision. Current findings highlight the value of examining inflexibility within social frameworks to better understand its role in adaptive functioning and psychopathology. Future research on interpretation inflexibility in social contexts could inform novel interventions and improve clinical outcomes.