Scholarlink

Background <p>Recent advancements in assistive robotic arms have enabled many people with tetraplegia to perform activities of daily living more independently. Because these systems typically require hand use, they are not a ready option for many individuals with <i>high-level</i> (C4 and above) tetraplegia. Such individuals, however, might be able to use signals that arise from the head and neck to control assistive devices. Therefore, the goal of the study was to evaluate the utility of several signals arising from the head and neck to control a robotic arm during 3D center-out reaching to multiple targets ~ 25–50&#xa0;cm from the start location.</p> Methods <p>Ten non-disabled human subjects were tested using five non-invasive, hands-free modalities (head position, head velocity, facial electromyography, tongue, and voice) to control a robot arm. For comparison, subjects also used joystick position and joystick velocity methods to control reaching movements of the robotic arm. A one-way repeated measures ANOVA was carried out on key performance indicators including movement time, path efficiency, throughput, and perceived workload.</p> Results <p>The hands-free control modalities of head position, facial EMG, tongue, and voice had average (± SD) movement times (5.8 ± 1.6, 8.2 ± 3.7, 6.3 ± 2.0, and 10.0 ± 3.7&#xa0;s, respectively). With the exception of voice, none of these times were significantly different than that of the benchmark hand position control of a joystick (6.3 ± 2.3&#xa0;s). Furthermore, no significant differences were revealed in perceived workload across control modalities.</p> Conclusions <p>These results indicate, therefore, that various non-invasive, hands-free methods could be used effectively by people with high-level tetraplegia to operate assistive robotic arms.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Hands-free control of an assistive robotic arm for high-level paralysis

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年5月9日

查看全文
  • Brady A. Hasse,
  • Mario A. Ibarra,
  • Jehad A. Alfaleh,
  • Derek Gin,
  • Drew E. G. Sheets,
  • Aaliyah M. P. A. Thompson-Mazzeo,
  • Andrew J. Fuglevand

摘要

Background

Recent advancements in assistive robotic arms have enabled many people with tetraplegia to perform activities of daily living more independently. Because these systems typically require hand use, they are not a ready option for many individuals with high-level (C4 and above) tetraplegia. Such individuals, however, might be able to use signals that arise from the head and neck to control assistive devices. Therefore, the goal of the study was to evaluate the utility of several signals arising from the head and neck to control a robotic arm during 3D center-out reaching to multiple targets ~ 25–50 cm from the start location.

Methods

Ten non-disabled human subjects were tested using five non-invasive, hands-free modalities (head position, head velocity, facial electromyography, tongue, and voice) to control a robot arm. For comparison, subjects also used joystick position and joystick velocity methods to control reaching movements of the robotic arm. A one-way repeated measures ANOVA was carried out on key performance indicators including movement time, path efficiency, throughput, and perceived workload.

Results

The hands-free control modalities of head position, facial EMG, tongue, and voice had average (± SD) movement times (5.8 ± 1.6, 8.2 ± 3.7, 6.3 ± 2.0, and 10.0 ± 3.7 s, respectively). With the exception of voice, none of these times were significantly different than that of the benchmark hand position control of a joystick (6.3 ± 2.3 s). Furthermore, no significant differences were revealed in perceived workload across control modalities.

Conclusions

These results indicate, therefore, that various non-invasive, hands-free methods could be used effectively by people with high-level tetraplegia to operate assistive robotic arms.