Background <p>Individuals who experience severe speech and physical impairment face significant challenges in communication and daily interaction. Visual brain–computer interfaces (BCIs) offer a potential assistive solution, but their usability is limited when facing restrictions in eye motor control, gaze redirection and fixation. This study investigates the feasibility of a gaze-independent visual oddball BCI for use as an augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) device in the presence of limited eye motor control.</p> Methods <p>Seven participants with varying degrees of eye motor control were recruited and their conditions were thoroughly assessed. Visual oddball BCI decoding accuracy was evaluated with multiple decoders in three visuospatial attention (VSA) conditions: overt VSA, with fixation cued on the target, covert VSA, with fixation cued on the center of the screen, and free VSA without gaze cue.</p> Results <p>covert VSA with central fixation leads to decreased accuracy, whereas free VSA is comparable to overt VSA for some participants. Furthermore, cross-condition decoder training and evaluation suggests that training with overt VSA may improve performance in BCI users experiencing gaze control difficulties.</p> Conclusions <p>These findings highlight the need for adaptive decoding strategies and further validation in applied settings in the presence of gaze impairment.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Visual ERP-based brain–computer interface use with severe physical, speech and eye movement impairments: case studies

  • Arne Van Den Kerchove,
  • Juliette Meunier,
  • Marie de Moura,
  • Alixe Willemssens,
  • Dorien Geeurickx,
  • Edward Schiettecatte,
  • Philip Van Damme,
  • Hakim Si-Mohammed,
  • François Cabestaing,
  • Etienne Allart,
  • Marc M. Van Hulle

摘要

Background

Individuals who experience severe speech and physical impairment face significant challenges in communication and daily interaction. Visual brain–computer interfaces (BCIs) offer a potential assistive solution, but their usability is limited when facing restrictions in eye motor control, gaze redirection and fixation. This study investigates the feasibility of a gaze-independent visual oddball BCI for use as an augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) device in the presence of limited eye motor control.

Methods

Seven participants with varying degrees of eye motor control were recruited and their conditions were thoroughly assessed. Visual oddball BCI decoding accuracy was evaluated with multiple decoders in three visuospatial attention (VSA) conditions: overt VSA, with fixation cued on the target, covert VSA, with fixation cued on the center of the screen, and free VSA without gaze cue.

Results

covert VSA with central fixation leads to decreased accuracy, whereas free VSA is comparable to overt VSA for some participants. Furthermore, cross-condition decoder training and evaluation suggests that training with overt VSA may improve performance in BCI users experiencing gaze control difficulties.

Conclusions

These findings highlight the need for adaptive decoding strategies and further validation in applied settings in the presence of gaze impairment.