Scholarlink

Background <p>Common mental health disorders contribute to global disability, yet improving mental health outcomes is rarely a goal of nutrition policy. There is emerging evidence that links food insecurity, diet quality, ultra-processed foods, and microbiota-gut-brain pathways with mental health. This policy document analysis examined how evidence on the relationship between diet and mental health is reflected in national dietary guidelines and large-scale nutrition and social protection programme documents.</p> Methods <p>Using Population-Concept-Context criteria and document analysis procedures guided by Arksey and O’Malley and Joanna Briggs Institute, and PRISMA extension for scoping review reporting principles, we identified selected national food-based dietary guidelines and flagship programme or policy documents (2000–March 2026) and examined whether and how they contained language related to mental health. These documents were retrieved from the portals of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and the United Nations Children’s Fund, UN agency repositories, and national or federal websites. The sample was multi-region but not an exhaustive census of all national dietary guidelines globally. We then synthesised data descriptively on characteristics, mental health framing, indicators, mechanisms, and equity.</p> Results <p>Nineteen documents met the criteria, including nine national guidelines, one global FBDG review, and nine programme and policy documents. Most documents were ‘silent’ or ‘symbolic’, using generic language about well-being or learning without clearly mentioning mental health outcomes, indicators, or mechanisms. The only exceptions were the U.S. National Strategy on Hunger, Nutrition, and Health and the Rural Health Produce Prescription Toolkit, which showed emergent integration by linking food insecurity to anxiety, depression, and toxic stress.</p> Conclusion <p>The science of the link between diet and mental health remains largely absent from formal nutrition guidance. Future revisions to guidelines and programmes should incorporate mental health outcomes and shared indicators across diverse high- and low-income settings.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Representation of diet and mental health evidence in national dietary guidelines and large-scale public health nutrition programmes

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年5月21日

查看全文
  • Uju Maryanne Onuorah,
  • Ebube Chinwe Arene,
  • Somtochukwu Faith Nwachukwu,
  • Sandra Chidimma Obilor,
  • Yunus Adeniran Dosunmu,
  • Saerimam Nzunde Markus,
  • Chinemerem Henry Ugo,
  • Perpetua Ngozi Eze,
  • Irenosen Addeh,
  • Jane Aruorivwooghene Ibude

摘要

Background

Common mental health disorders contribute to global disability, yet improving mental health outcomes is rarely a goal of nutrition policy. There is emerging evidence that links food insecurity, diet quality, ultra-processed foods, and microbiota-gut-brain pathways with mental health. This policy document analysis examined how evidence on the relationship between diet and mental health is reflected in national dietary guidelines and large-scale nutrition and social protection programme documents.

Methods

Using Population-Concept-Context criteria and document analysis procedures guided by Arksey and O’Malley and Joanna Briggs Institute, and PRISMA extension for scoping review reporting principles, we identified selected national food-based dietary guidelines and flagship programme or policy documents (2000–March 2026) and examined whether and how they contained language related to mental health. These documents were retrieved from the portals of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and the United Nations Children’s Fund, UN agency repositories, and national or federal websites. The sample was multi-region but not an exhaustive census of all national dietary guidelines globally. We then synthesised data descriptively on characteristics, mental health framing, indicators, mechanisms, and equity.

Results

Nineteen documents met the criteria, including nine national guidelines, one global FBDG review, and nine programme and policy documents. Most documents were ‘silent’ or ‘symbolic’, using generic language about well-being or learning without clearly mentioning mental health outcomes, indicators, or mechanisms. The only exceptions were the U.S. National Strategy on Hunger, Nutrition, and Health and the Rural Health Produce Prescription Toolkit, which showed emergent integration by linking food insecurity to anxiety, depression, and toxic stress.

Conclusion

The science of the link between diet and mental health remains largely absent from formal nutrition guidance. Future revisions to guidelines and programmes should incorporate mental health outcomes and shared indicators across diverse high- and low-income settings.