Background <p>Human gut microbiome research has expanded remarkably over the past two decades, revealing the fundamental role of gut microbes in human health and disease. Despite these advances, translation into evidence-based clinical practice and public health implementation remains exceptionally limited. This integrative translational perspective review evaluates human gut microbiome research across four critical aspects: translational successes, barriers to effective translation, applicability of frameworks from other medical disciplines, and strategies to enhance translational progress.</p> Main text <p>Human gut microbiome research was evaluated through the lens of translational medical research principles, as summarised below. (1) <b>Translational successes in human gut microbiome research</b> are explored by analysing the developmental pathways of major microbiome-based or microbiome-targeted approaches, including faecal microbiota transplantation, probiotics, postbiotics, prebiotics, and dietary interventions, despite overall limited clinical and public health translation. (2) <b>Established translational medical research frameworks</b> served as a foundation to identify missing elements in current human gut microbiome research, including progression through T0–T4 phases, bidirectional knowledge flow, prioritization of unmet patient and societal health needs, patient-centric approaches, stakeholder engagement, and interdisciplinary collaboration. Integration of these principles is discussed in light of the specific characteristics, challenges, and limitations of human gut microbiome research. (3) <b>Translational barriers in human gut microbiome research</b> were analysed beyond limited integration of translational medical principles. These arise from the inherent complexity and high-dimensional nature of the gut microbiome, temporal and inter-individual variability, confounding factors, inconsistent methodological standardization and validation, and fragmentation across research efforts. Collectively, these barriers hinder causal inference, resulting in a low-quality evidence base and limiting effective translation. (4) <b>A framework to advance translational human gut microbiome research</b> is proposed based on the previous findings, including strategic priorities such as education and training in translational research principles for gut microbiome researchers. </p> Conclusions <p>Human gut microbiome research remains largely confined to early translational phases, with progression toward effective translation limited by intrinsic and methodological barriers that hinder causal inference and high-level evidence generation. Integration of core translational medical research principles offers a pathway to bridge these gaps, with education and training of gut microbiome researchers emerging as a key priority for advancing translational progress.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Translational human gut microbiome research: What are the missing pieces of the puzzle?

  • Marina Fassarella,
  • Hauke Smidt

摘要

Background

Human gut microbiome research has expanded remarkably over the past two decades, revealing the fundamental role of gut microbes in human health and disease. Despite these advances, translation into evidence-based clinical practice and public health implementation remains exceptionally limited. This integrative translational perspective review evaluates human gut microbiome research across four critical aspects: translational successes, barriers to effective translation, applicability of frameworks from other medical disciplines, and strategies to enhance translational progress.

Main text

Human gut microbiome research was evaluated through the lens of translational medical research principles, as summarised below. (1) Translational successes in human gut microbiome research are explored by analysing the developmental pathways of major microbiome-based or microbiome-targeted approaches, including faecal microbiota transplantation, probiotics, postbiotics, prebiotics, and dietary interventions, despite overall limited clinical and public health translation. (2) Established translational medical research frameworks served as a foundation to identify missing elements in current human gut microbiome research, including progression through T0–T4 phases, bidirectional knowledge flow, prioritization of unmet patient and societal health needs, patient-centric approaches, stakeholder engagement, and interdisciplinary collaboration. Integration of these principles is discussed in light of the specific characteristics, challenges, and limitations of human gut microbiome research. (3) Translational barriers in human gut microbiome research were analysed beyond limited integration of translational medical principles. These arise from the inherent complexity and high-dimensional nature of the gut microbiome, temporal and inter-individual variability, confounding factors, inconsistent methodological standardization and validation, and fragmentation across research efforts. Collectively, these barriers hinder causal inference, resulting in a low-quality evidence base and limiting effective translation. (4) A framework to advance translational human gut microbiome research is proposed based on the previous findings, including strategic priorities such as education and training in translational research principles for gut microbiome researchers.

Conclusions

Human gut microbiome research remains largely confined to early translational phases, with progression toward effective translation limited by intrinsic and methodological barriers that hinder causal inference and high-level evidence generation. Integration of core translational medical research principles offers a pathway to bridge these gaps, with education and training of gut microbiome researchers emerging as a key priority for advancing translational progress.