Scholarlink

Background <p>Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a highly heterogeneous neurodevelopmental condition with a complex genetic architecture. While over a thousand risk genes have been cataloged, a fundamental challenge remains how this vast genetic landscape translates into diverse clinical manifestations. To address this, we propose a “many-to-few” framework, shifting from traditional “many-to-one” convergence model toward an intrinsic organizational architecture where disparate ASD risk genes funnel into discrete molecular dimensions.</p> Methods <p>By leveraging similarity network fusion (SNF) to integrate bulk and single-nucleus RNA sequencing data, we decomposed the 311 ASD reliable risk genes into three stable, spatiotemporally distinct molecular subtypes. These subtypes represent coordinated expression programs that integrate functionally diverse genes, such as those involved in synaptic signaling, mRNA stabilization, and histone modification. Mapping de novo variants from the SPARK cohort onto these subtypes enabled stratification of probands into three genetically defined subgroups (S1–S3) with divergent clinical profiles.</p> Results <p>Transcriptomic decomposition partitioned the 311 reliable risk genes into three stable molecular subtypes, Synaptic Signaling (C1), mRNA Stabilization (C2), and Histone Modification (C3), exhibiting divergent spatiotemporal trajectories and cell-type-specific enrichment. Patient subgroups stratified based on these molecular subtypes displayed significant differences in adaptive functioning, core symptoms, and psychiatric comorbidities, while a reference group (S4) lacking de novo variants of these highly reliable ASD risk genes exhibited the most preserved functions. Furthermore, diverging rare and common genetic liability profiles across subgroups, particularly between S1 and S3, provide empirical support for a molecular subtype-based liability threshold model.</p> Conclusions <p>Our study establishes a biologically informed framework that links intrinsic molecular subtypes to multidimensional phenotypic constellation, advancing mechanistic insight and offering translational potential for precision stratification and intervention.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Decomposing the genetic risk of autism spectrum disorder into discrete molecular subtypes underlie clinical heterogeneity based on transcriptome profile

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年6月3日

查看全文
  • Lingxue Luo,
  • Xuping Gao,
  • Tao Pang,
  • Kaifang Pang,
  • Tianyun Wang,
  • Hui Guo,
  • Li Yang,
  • Suhua Chang

摘要

Background

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a highly heterogeneous neurodevelopmental condition with a complex genetic architecture. While over a thousand risk genes have been cataloged, a fundamental challenge remains how this vast genetic landscape translates into diverse clinical manifestations. To address this, we propose a “many-to-few” framework, shifting from traditional “many-to-one” convergence model toward an intrinsic organizational architecture where disparate ASD risk genes funnel into discrete molecular dimensions.

Methods

By leveraging similarity network fusion (SNF) to integrate bulk and single-nucleus RNA sequencing data, we decomposed the 311 ASD reliable risk genes into three stable, spatiotemporally distinct molecular subtypes. These subtypes represent coordinated expression programs that integrate functionally diverse genes, such as those involved in synaptic signaling, mRNA stabilization, and histone modification. Mapping de novo variants from the SPARK cohort onto these subtypes enabled stratification of probands into three genetically defined subgroups (S1–S3) with divergent clinical profiles.

Results

Transcriptomic decomposition partitioned the 311 reliable risk genes into three stable molecular subtypes, Synaptic Signaling (C1), mRNA Stabilization (C2), and Histone Modification (C3), exhibiting divergent spatiotemporal trajectories and cell-type-specific enrichment. Patient subgroups stratified based on these molecular subtypes displayed significant differences in adaptive functioning, core symptoms, and psychiatric comorbidities, while a reference group (S4) lacking de novo variants of these highly reliable ASD risk genes exhibited the most preserved functions. Furthermore, diverging rare and common genetic liability profiles across subgroups, particularly between S1 and S3, provide empirical support for a molecular subtype-based liability threshold model.

Conclusions

Our study establishes a biologically informed framework that links intrinsic molecular subtypes to multidimensional phenotypic constellation, advancing mechanistic insight and offering translational potential for precision stratification and intervention.