Scholarlink

Background <p>Biospecimen collection from study participants is essential for translational research, but operational challenges in study setup and conduct often impede successful delivery. This study uses a comparative approach to explore key logistical and staffing factors influencing setup duration, recruitment efficiency, sample acquisition, and data completeness across three investigator-led microbiome-wide association studies (MWAS) conducted at cancer centres in Ireland.</p> Methods <p>Three academic observational MWAS enrolling participants with cancers of the breast, gastrointestinal tract, lung, biliary system, kidney, and skin were compared. Data from three cancer centres were analysed. Key variables included study team composition, administrative infrastructure, and full-time equivalent (FTE) research staffing. Metrics assessed included setup duration, recruitment rates, sample acquisition, and data completeness. Descriptive statistics, correlation analyses, and regression models were used to examine relationships between staffing and study performance.</p> Results <p>Setup duration ranged from 30&#xa0;days (Site B, with a pre-established trials unit) to 390&#xa0;days (Site A, with no dedicated setup personnel). At Site C, the addition of an Academic Clinical Trials Coordinator reduced the remaining setup timeline from 274 to 185&#xa0;days. Recruitment rates ranged from 1.1 to 1.3 participants/month, with the highest rates at sites with dedicated research nurses (RN +). Sample acquisition was 100% at RN + sites and 70.5% at the RN− site. Site C achieved full data completeness, defined as comprehensive documentation of screening, exclusions, and follow-up outcomes. Statistical modelling suggested that dedicated staffing (both administrative and clinical) was associated with improvements across all metrics, although small sample size limited statistical significance.</p> Conclusions <p>Dedicated administrative and clinical trial personnel significantly may enhance study efficiency, participant recruitment, and biospecimen collection in academic translational research. This study provides practical insights for improving study design and infrastructure planning in future observational studies. To our knowledge, this is the first multi-site comparative evaluation of operational determinants in academic MWAS.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Operational determinants of recruitment and biospecimen collection in translational observational studies: a multi-site comparative analysis

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年10月10日

查看全文
  • Ciarán Devoy,
  • Ronan Andrew McLaughlin,
  • Christopher Cronin,
  • Rachel Clarke,
  • Roisin M. Connolly,
  • Erin Crowley,
  • Laia Raigal,
  • Dearbhaile Collins,
  • Brian Bird,
  • Bryan T. Hennessy,
  • Mark Tangney

摘要

Background

Biospecimen collection from study participants is essential for translational research, but operational challenges in study setup and conduct often impede successful delivery. This study uses a comparative approach to explore key logistical and staffing factors influencing setup duration, recruitment efficiency, sample acquisition, and data completeness across three investigator-led microbiome-wide association studies (MWAS) conducted at cancer centres in Ireland.

Methods

Three academic observational MWAS enrolling participants with cancers of the breast, gastrointestinal tract, lung, biliary system, kidney, and skin were compared. Data from three cancer centres were analysed. Key variables included study team composition, administrative infrastructure, and full-time equivalent (FTE) research staffing. Metrics assessed included setup duration, recruitment rates, sample acquisition, and data completeness. Descriptive statistics, correlation analyses, and regression models were used to examine relationships between staffing and study performance.

Results

Setup duration ranged from 30 days (Site B, with a pre-established trials unit) to 390 days (Site A, with no dedicated setup personnel). At Site C, the addition of an Academic Clinical Trials Coordinator reduced the remaining setup timeline from 274 to 185 days. Recruitment rates ranged from 1.1 to 1.3 participants/month, with the highest rates at sites with dedicated research nurses (RN +). Sample acquisition was 100% at RN + sites and 70.5% at the RN− site. Site C achieved full data completeness, defined as comprehensive documentation of screening, exclusions, and follow-up outcomes. Statistical modelling suggested that dedicated staffing (both administrative and clinical) was associated with improvements across all metrics, although small sample size limited statistical significance.

Conclusions

Dedicated administrative and clinical trial personnel significantly may enhance study efficiency, participant recruitment, and biospecimen collection in academic translational research. This study provides practical insights for improving study design and infrastructure planning in future observational studies. To our knowledge, this is the first multi-site comparative evaluation of operational determinants in academic MWAS.