Scholarlink

Background <p>The primary aim was to identify combinations including ≥ 3 behavior change techniques (BCTs) that are jointly used in behavioral interventions for women with/survivors of breast cancer, and result in a simultaneous improvement of physical activity, healthy nutrition behaviour, and healthy body weight maintenance.</p> Methods <p>A meta-review integrated evidence from systematic, scoping, and pragmatic reviews. Ten databases were searched using ASReviews software and through manual searches, resulting in the inclusion of 32 reviews. The ROBIS tool was applied to assess bias risk. All combinations of ≥ 3 BCTs were identified in the original studies, and ratios of studies indicating a significant improvement to those with no improvement were calculated for three outcome domains. BCT combinations used in ≥ 10 original intervention studies (with ≥ 3 studies per each outcome domain) and supported in ≥ 85% of intervention studies were identified as the most promising.</p> Results <p>A total of <i>k</i> = 17,715 combinations were identified, including 3–12 BCTs. Only 46 combinations met the criteria for the most promising ones (supported by ≥ 85% of studies), with 7 combinations supported in ≥ 90% of studies. The promising combinations contained 3–6 BCTs included the following: goal setting (behaviour), problem solving, demonstration of the behaviour, self-monitoring of behaviour, instruction on how to perform the behaviour, feedback on behaviour, credible source. Interestingly, goal setting (related to behaviour or outcome) was present in 22 of the supported combinations, whereas demonstration of behaviour, problem solving, and self-monitoring were included more frequently (33, 32, and 26 of supported combinations, respectively).</p> Conclusions <p>This meta-review offers a novel approach to identifying BCT combinations that are jointly used in interventions resulting in an improvement in physical activity, healthy nutrition behaviour, and healthy body weight maintenance. These evidence-based combinations may serve as examples of good practices for promoting a healthy lifestyle in the context of breast cancer.</p> Trial registration <p>PROSPERO database registration: #CRD420251130311.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Which combinations of behaviour change techniques work best? Evidence from meta-review of interventions addressing healthy diet and exercise after breast cancer

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年8月4日

查看全文
  • Monika Boberska,
  • Dominika Wietrzykowska,
  • Ewa Kulis,
  • Julia Kuzminska,
  • Karolina Zalewska-Lunkiewicz,
  • Eva Karaglani,
  • Niki Mourouti,
  • Yannis Manios,
  • Aleksandra Luszczynska,
  • Anna Gavrieli,
  • Christos Diou,
  • Christina Pelekanou,
  • Agathi Ntzouvani,
  • Aristotelis Ballas,
  • Ioannis Ioakeimidis,
  • Miguel Cejalvo,
  • Juan Andújar,
  • Juan Antonio Carbonell-Asins,
  • Rosana Pau Landa,
  • Carlos Peña de los Santos,
  • Sheila Romero Chaveli,
  • Maite Martínez Martínez,
  • Marta Tapia Céspedes,
  • Begoña Bermejo de las Heras,
  • Blanca Alabadí,
  • Miguel Civera,
  • Ana Miralles Marco,
  • Gintare Kaliniene,
  • Erika Korobeinikova,
  • Ricardas Radisauskas,
  • Lina Paulauskienė,
  • Ida Liseckiene,
  • Renata Kudukyte-Gaspere,
  • Rugile Ivanauskiene,
  • Anita Wanngren,
  • Britt Sandberg,
  • Roelinde Middelveld,,
  • Linda Engström,
  • Ana Molina Barceló,
  • Mireia Gandia Prat,
  • Oscar García-Sauret,
  • Teresa de Pablo Pardo,
  • Raquel Soler Blasco,
  • Šarūnas Narbutas,
  • Neringa Čiakienė,
  • Asta Tamulėnė,
  • Aikaterini Palascha,
  • Nina McGrath,
  • Laura Bosman,
  • Justine van der Feen,
  • Ana Roca-Umbert,
  • Frans Folkvord,
  • Francisco Lupiáñez-Villanueva,
  • Anna-Maria Krooupa,
  • Nikos Giatsoglou,
  • Vicky Fiska,
  • Antonis Tsanakas,
  • Spiros Nikolopoulos,,
  • Nikos Sarris,
  • Symeon Papadopoulos,
  • Mariangela Panniello,
  • Maria Plakia,
  • Lorenzo Giuliani,
  • Tasos Litsas,
  • Konstantinos Kalampokis,
  • Theodora Karali,
  • Alexios Camarinopoulos,
  • Ilias Maglogiannis,
  • Andreas Menychtas,
  • Christos Panagopoulos,
  • Antonis Pardos,
  • Vasilis Athanasiou,
  • Lisa Becker,
  • Giuseppe Martone,
  • Laurène Mathey,
  • Alexis Strader,
  • Alexandra Olson,
  • Marta Burgos,
  • Gemma Galdón,
  • Odysseas Androutsos,
  • Vaios Svolos,
  • Maria Koutsaki

摘要

Background

The primary aim was to identify combinations including ≥ 3 behavior change techniques (BCTs) that are jointly used in behavioral interventions for women with/survivors of breast cancer, and result in a simultaneous improvement of physical activity, healthy nutrition behaviour, and healthy body weight maintenance.

Methods

A meta-review integrated evidence from systematic, scoping, and pragmatic reviews. Ten databases were searched using ASReviews software and through manual searches, resulting in the inclusion of 32 reviews. The ROBIS tool was applied to assess bias risk. All combinations of ≥ 3 BCTs were identified in the original studies, and ratios of studies indicating a significant improvement to those with no improvement were calculated for three outcome domains. BCT combinations used in ≥ 10 original intervention studies (with ≥ 3 studies per each outcome domain) and supported in ≥ 85% of intervention studies were identified as the most promising.

Results

A total of k = 17,715 combinations were identified, including 3–12 BCTs. Only 46 combinations met the criteria for the most promising ones (supported by ≥ 85% of studies), with 7 combinations supported in ≥ 90% of studies. The promising combinations contained 3–6 BCTs included the following: goal setting (behaviour), problem solving, demonstration of the behaviour, self-monitoring of behaviour, instruction on how to perform the behaviour, feedback on behaviour, credible source. Interestingly, goal setting (related to behaviour or outcome) was present in 22 of the supported combinations, whereas demonstration of behaviour, problem solving, and self-monitoring were included more frequently (33, 32, and 26 of supported combinations, respectively).

Conclusions

This meta-review offers a novel approach to identifying BCT combinations that are jointly used in interventions resulting in an improvement in physical activity, healthy nutrition behaviour, and healthy body weight maintenance. These evidence-based combinations may serve as examples of good practices for promoting a healthy lifestyle in the context of breast cancer.

Trial registration

PROSPERO database registration: #CRD420251130311.