Scholarlink

Background <p>Electrotaxis, the directed cell movement in direct current electric field (dcEF), is crucial for wound healing and development. We recently proposed a biphasic electrotaxis mechanism, where an initial rapid response is driven by ionic mechanisms, while redistribution of membrane components come into play during prolonged exposure to dcEF.</p> Methods <p>To verify this hypothesis, we studied the redistribution dynamics of EGFR, PDGFRα/β, and TGFβR1 in dcEF. For this purpose, we utilized cells transfected with plasmids encoding fluorescently tagged receptors, which were exposed to dcEF in a custom-designed electrotactic chamber. Fluorescent images were captured using wide-field or TIRF microscopy, enabling precise quantitative analysis of receptor redistribution. Additionally, the functional significance of these selected receptors in electrotaxis was evaluated by silencing their expression using an siRNA library.</p> Results <p>Although EGFR moved immediately to cathode after dcEF application, maximum distribution asymmetry was reached after 30–40&#xa0;min. This process was more efficient at higher dcEF intensities, specifically, asymmetry was greater at 3&#xa0;V/cm compared to 1&#xa0;V/cm, consistent with the biphasic mechanism observed only under the stronger dcEF. Additionally, redistribution was more effective under alkaline conditions and near the cell base, but decreased when glass was coated with poly-L-lysine, indicating electroosmosis as a key factor. Importantly, EGFR redistribution did not correlate with the rapid reaction of 3T3 cells to dcEF reversal, which occurred within 1–2&#xa0;min, when receptor orientation was not yet reversed. PDGFRα exhibited similar but less marked cathodal redistribution, while PDGFRβ and TGFβR1 did not redistribute. siRNA knockdown experiments confirmed the importance of EGFR and ErbB4 in the electrotaxis. EGFR’s role was largely ligand-independent, and it had a significant impact on the response of 3T3 cells to dcEF during the first hour of the experiment, but was not involved in the fastest response, which was Kir-dependent.</p> Conclusions <p>Our study suggests that EGFR redistribution may play a role in the early stages and partially contribute to the long-term electrotaxis of 3T3 fibroblasts. However, this mechanism alone does not fully explain rapid responses to dcEF orientation changes indicating a more complex, multimodal mechanism of electrotaxis in these cells.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

The dynamics of chemoattractant receptors redistribution in the electrotaxis of 3T3 fibroblasts

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年4月8日

查看全文
  • Jagoda Gorzkowska,
  • Wiktoria Kozak,
  • Sylwia Bobis-Wozowicz,
  • Ivan Cherepashuk,
  • Zbigniew Madeja,
  • Sławomir Lasota

摘要

Background

Electrotaxis, the directed cell movement in direct current electric field (dcEF), is crucial for wound healing and development. We recently proposed a biphasic electrotaxis mechanism, where an initial rapid response is driven by ionic mechanisms, while redistribution of membrane components come into play during prolonged exposure to dcEF.

Methods

To verify this hypothesis, we studied the redistribution dynamics of EGFR, PDGFRα/β, and TGFβR1 in dcEF. For this purpose, we utilized cells transfected with plasmids encoding fluorescently tagged receptors, which were exposed to dcEF in a custom-designed electrotactic chamber. Fluorescent images were captured using wide-field or TIRF microscopy, enabling precise quantitative analysis of receptor redistribution. Additionally, the functional significance of these selected receptors in electrotaxis was evaluated by silencing their expression using an siRNA library.

Results

Although EGFR moved immediately to cathode after dcEF application, maximum distribution asymmetry was reached after 30–40 min. This process was more efficient at higher dcEF intensities, specifically, asymmetry was greater at 3 V/cm compared to 1 V/cm, consistent with the biphasic mechanism observed only under the stronger dcEF. Additionally, redistribution was more effective under alkaline conditions and near the cell base, but decreased when glass was coated with poly-L-lysine, indicating electroosmosis as a key factor. Importantly, EGFR redistribution did not correlate with the rapid reaction of 3T3 cells to dcEF reversal, which occurred within 1–2 min, when receptor orientation was not yet reversed. PDGFRα exhibited similar but less marked cathodal redistribution, while PDGFRβ and TGFβR1 did not redistribute. siRNA knockdown experiments confirmed the importance of EGFR and ErbB4 in the electrotaxis. EGFR’s role was largely ligand-independent, and it had a significant impact on the response of 3T3 cells to dcEF during the first hour of the experiment, but was not involved in the fastest response, which was Kir-dependent.

Conclusions

Our study suggests that EGFR redistribution may play a role in the early stages and partially contribute to the long-term electrotaxis of 3T3 fibroblasts. However, this mechanism alone does not fully explain rapid responses to dcEF orientation changes indicating a more complex, multimodal mechanism of electrotaxis in these cells.