Scholarlink

Background <p>The bites from infected female <i>Anopheles</i> mosquitoes lead to hundreds of thousands of deaths annually. To find a human, mosquitoes rely on their keen sense of smell. Repellents are chemicals that can target a mosquito’s chemosensory senses. Therefore, targeting olfaction using repellents can be an effective way to prevent their attraction to humans and subsequent biting. However, the precise mechanisms underlying the mode of action for most commonly used repellents is surprisingly not well known. Recent evidence suggests that commonly used insect repellents target <i>Anopheles</i> mosquitoes by either activating mosquito olfactory neurons to trigger aversive responses or masking natural attractant cues emitted by the host to reduce attraction.</p> Methods <p>In this study, we used a combination of olfactory behavioral assays, calcium imaging of antennal neurons, and volatile organic compounds measurement in <i>Anopheles</i> mosquitoes to determine the specific mechanism by which one commercial repellent might outperform another. In our experiments, we assessed commercial products containing synthetic (DEET, IR3535, picaridin) or natural (p-menthane-3,8-diol, essential oils) ingredients.</p> Results <p>We found that natural products performed better than synthetic repellents on rapid odor-based repellency assays. On odor-based assays that allowed for longer time periods and odor accumulation, both products performed well, with p-methane-3,8-diol products showing consistent performance in both odor-based assays. Synthetic products demonstrated longer-lasting odor concentrations compared to more volatile natural products. The antennal olfactory neuron responses demonstrated clear differences between the two categories. We found that for <i>Anopheles</i> mosquitoes, the most effective products often combined masking and odor repellency, activated a number of antennal neurons, and evaporated at a slow rate.</p> Conclusions <p>This approach provides insights into rational development of more effective <i>Anopheles</i> vector controls. Understanding the influence by which different mechanisms contribute to a repellent’s function can improve vector control strategies for malaria-endemic regions.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Odor repellency and neuronal responses of commercial products towards Anopheles mosquitoes

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年12月13日

查看全文
  • Minh N. Nguyen,
  • Julia M. Johnson,
  • Inioluwa Olaleye,
  • Christopher J. Potter

摘要

Background

The bites from infected female Anopheles mosquitoes lead to hundreds of thousands of deaths annually. To find a human, mosquitoes rely on their keen sense of smell. Repellents are chemicals that can target a mosquito’s chemosensory senses. Therefore, targeting olfaction using repellents can be an effective way to prevent their attraction to humans and subsequent biting. However, the precise mechanisms underlying the mode of action for most commonly used repellents is surprisingly not well known. Recent evidence suggests that commonly used insect repellents target Anopheles mosquitoes by either activating mosquito olfactory neurons to trigger aversive responses or masking natural attractant cues emitted by the host to reduce attraction.

Methods

In this study, we used a combination of olfactory behavioral assays, calcium imaging of antennal neurons, and volatile organic compounds measurement in Anopheles mosquitoes to determine the specific mechanism by which one commercial repellent might outperform another. In our experiments, we assessed commercial products containing synthetic (DEET, IR3535, picaridin) or natural (p-menthane-3,8-diol, essential oils) ingredients.

Results

We found that natural products performed better than synthetic repellents on rapid odor-based repellency assays. On odor-based assays that allowed for longer time periods and odor accumulation, both products performed well, with p-methane-3,8-diol products showing consistent performance in both odor-based assays. Synthetic products demonstrated longer-lasting odor concentrations compared to more volatile natural products. The antennal olfactory neuron responses demonstrated clear differences between the two categories. We found that for Anopheles mosquitoes, the most effective products often combined masking and odor repellency, activated a number of antennal neurons, and evaporated at a slow rate.

Conclusions

This approach provides insights into rational development of more effective Anopheles vector controls. Understanding the influence by which different mechanisms contribute to a repellent’s function can improve vector control strategies for malaria-endemic regions.