Scholarlink

Background <p>We recently reported that the ovarian cancer G protein-coupled receptor-1 (OGR1) can be pharmacologically biased with specific benzodiazepines to couple with distinct heterotrimeric G proteins in human airway smooth muscle (ASM) cells. Lorazepam stimulated both G<sub>s</sub> and G<sub>q</sub> signaling via OGR1, whereas sulazepam only stimulated G<sub>s</sub> signaling in ASM cells. The present study sought to determine the effects of sulazepam and lorazepam on contraction of human precision cut lung slices (hPCLS), and detail the biochemical mechanisms mediating these effects.</p> Methods <p>Models of histamine (His) -stimulated contraction included imaging of ex vivo human precision cut lung slices (hPCLS) and Magnetic Twisting Cytometry (MTC) analysis of human ASM cell stiffness. To explore mechanisms of regulation, we examined effects on myosin light chain (pMLC) phosphorylation and PKA activity in primary human ASM cultures, as well as actin cytoskeleton integrity as defined by changes in the ratio of F to G actin assessed by immunofluorescence.</p> Results <p>In a dose-dependent manner, sulazepam relaxed His-contracted hPCLS and reduced baseline cell stiffness. Lorazepam did not relax His-contracted hPCLS, and only at a maximal dose (100&#xa0;μM) did lorazepam relax baseline cell stiffness. The G<sub>s</sub>-biased ligand sulazepam stimulated PKA activity as evidenced by significant induction of VASP and HSP20 phosphorylation, which was associated with significant inhibition of His-induced pMLC phosphorylation. Conversely, the balanced ligand lorazepam did not significantly increase HSP20 phosphorylation or VASP phosphorylation and did not significantly inhibit His-induced MLC phosphorylation. Sulazepam was also able to inhibit histamine induced F-actin formation.</p> Conclusions <p>The G<sub>s</sub>-biased OGR1 ligand sulazepam relaxed contracted ASM in both tissue- and cell- based models, via inhibition of MLC phosphorylation in a PKA-dependent manner and through inhibition of actin stress fiber formation. The relative inability of the balanced ligand lorazepam to influence ASM contractile state was likely due to competitive actions of concomitant G<sub>q</sub> and G<sub>s</sub> signaling.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Ovarian Cancer G protein-coupled receptor-1 signaling bias dictates anti-contractile effect of benzodiazepines on airway smooth muscle

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年5月13日

查看全文
  • Dominic R. Villalba,
  • Arun K. Jannu,
  • Elham Javed,
  • Isha Dandekar,
  • Ruping Wang,
  • Deepak A. Deshpande,
  • Steven S. An,
  • Reynold A. Panettieri Jr.,
  • Dale D. Tang,
  • Raymond B. Penn,
  • Ajay P. Nayak

摘要

Background

We recently reported that the ovarian cancer G protein-coupled receptor-1 (OGR1) can be pharmacologically biased with specific benzodiazepines to couple with distinct heterotrimeric G proteins in human airway smooth muscle (ASM) cells. Lorazepam stimulated both Gs and Gq signaling via OGR1, whereas sulazepam only stimulated Gs signaling in ASM cells. The present study sought to determine the effects of sulazepam and lorazepam on contraction of human precision cut lung slices (hPCLS), and detail the biochemical mechanisms mediating these effects.

Methods

Models of histamine (His) -stimulated contraction included imaging of ex vivo human precision cut lung slices (hPCLS) and Magnetic Twisting Cytometry (MTC) analysis of human ASM cell stiffness. To explore mechanisms of regulation, we examined effects on myosin light chain (pMLC) phosphorylation and PKA activity in primary human ASM cultures, as well as actin cytoskeleton integrity as defined by changes in the ratio of F to G actin assessed by immunofluorescence.

Results

In a dose-dependent manner, sulazepam relaxed His-contracted hPCLS and reduced baseline cell stiffness. Lorazepam did not relax His-contracted hPCLS, and only at a maximal dose (100 μM) did lorazepam relax baseline cell stiffness. The Gs-biased ligand sulazepam stimulated PKA activity as evidenced by significant induction of VASP and HSP20 phosphorylation, which was associated with significant inhibition of His-induced pMLC phosphorylation. Conversely, the balanced ligand lorazepam did not significantly increase HSP20 phosphorylation or VASP phosphorylation and did not significantly inhibit His-induced MLC phosphorylation. Sulazepam was also able to inhibit histamine induced F-actin formation.

Conclusions

The Gs-biased OGR1 ligand sulazepam relaxed contracted ASM in both tissue- and cell- based models, via inhibition of MLC phosphorylation in a PKA-dependent manner and through inhibition of actin stress fiber formation. The relative inability of the balanced ligand lorazepam to influence ASM contractile state was likely due to competitive actions of concomitant Gq and Gs signaling.