Scholarlink

Background <p>Keloid disorder (KD) encompasses a spectrum of fibroproliferative dermal conditions, the pathogenesis remains complex and incompletely understood. This study sought to identify biomarkers and potential therapeutic targets for KD through an integrative bioinformatics approach and machine learning analysis of RNA sequencing data.</p> Methods <p>RNA sequencing was performed on skin tissue samples from 13 patients with KD and 14 healthy controls. Using weighted gene co-expression network analysis and differential expression analysis revealed differentially expressed key module genes, and the CytoHubba plugin identified candidate genes. Subsequently analyzed using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and support vector machine recursive feature elimination (SVM-RFE) methods to pinpoint feature genes associated with KD. Following this, biomarkers were determined through expression level validation, enrichment analysis, and immune infiltration analysis.</p> Results <p>A total of 420 differentially expressed key module genes were identified, and the top 10 genes with DMNC values were selected as candidate genes. Five feature genes were selected through LASSO and SVM-RFE, with NID2, MFAP2, COL8A1, and P4HA3 showing significant expression differences between KD and control samples, along with consistent expression patterns across datasets, identified as potential biomarkers. These four biomarkers were proved to possess high diagnostic potential, and they were found to exhibit significant positive correlations with one another. Functional enrichment analysis indicated that the primary KEGG pathways associated with these biomarkers included “steroid hormone biosynthesis” and “cytokine–cytokine receptor interaction.” Moreover, immune infiltration analysis revealed that the four biomarkers were negatively correlated with type 17 T helper cells and positively correlated with 15 immune cell types, including activated B cells and central memory CD4 T cells.</p> Conclusion <p>In conclusion, NID2, MFAP2, COL8A1, and P4HA3 were identified as key biomarkers for KD, offering new avenues for more targeted and effective diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for managing this condition.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Identification of potential biomarkers and mechanisms for keloid disorder based on comprehensive bioinformatics analysis and machine learning algorithms

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年7月1日

查看全文
  • Bowen Zheng,
  • Jianxiong Qiao,
  • Xiaoping Yu,
  • Hanghang Zhou,
  • Anqi Wang,
  • Xuanfen Zhang

摘要

Background

Keloid disorder (KD) encompasses a spectrum of fibroproliferative dermal conditions, the pathogenesis remains complex and incompletely understood. This study sought to identify biomarkers and potential therapeutic targets for KD through an integrative bioinformatics approach and machine learning analysis of RNA sequencing data.

Methods

RNA sequencing was performed on skin tissue samples from 13 patients with KD and 14 healthy controls. Using weighted gene co-expression network analysis and differential expression analysis revealed differentially expressed key module genes, and the CytoHubba plugin identified candidate genes. Subsequently analyzed using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and support vector machine recursive feature elimination (SVM-RFE) methods to pinpoint feature genes associated with KD. Following this, biomarkers were determined through expression level validation, enrichment analysis, and immune infiltration analysis.

Results

A total of 420 differentially expressed key module genes were identified, and the top 10 genes with DMNC values were selected as candidate genes. Five feature genes were selected through LASSO and SVM-RFE, with NID2, MFAP2, COL8A1, and P4HA3 showing significant expression differences between KD and control samples, along with consistent expression patterns across datasets, identified as potential biomarkers. These four biomarkers were proved to possess high diagnostic potential, and they were found to exhibit significant positive correlations with one another. Functional enrichment analysis indicated that the primary KEGG pathways associated with these biomarkers included “steroid hormone biosynthesis” and “cytokine–cytokine receptor interaction.” Moreover, immune infiltration analysis revealed that the four biomarkers were negatively correlated with type 17 T helper cells and positively correlated with 15 immune cell types, including activated B cells and central memory CD4 T cells.

Conclusion

In conclusion, NID2, MFAP2, COL8A1, and P4HA3 were identified as key biomarkers for KD, offering new avenues for more targeted and effective diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for managing this condition.