Background <p>Intrahepatic fat accumulation presents spatial heterogeneity, potentially varying across steatotic liver disease (SLD) subcategories. Current whole-liver spatial profiling remains limited. In this study, we systematically evaluated spatial fat distribution patterns in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), alcohol-related liver disease (ALD), and SLD with chronic hepatitis B (SLD&amp;CHB) using a fully automated nnU-Net model for whole-liver segmentation and two-point Dixon MRI-based fat fraction mapping.</p> Methods <p>This multicenter retrospective study included the analysis of 682 patients with hepatic steatosis (MASLD: 451; ALD: 89; SLD&amp;CHB: 142) who underwent two-point Dixon MRI. The fully automated nnU-Net-based MRI framework was developed with in-phase (IP), out-phase (OP), water, and fat images, and the model performance was quantified using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) score. The fat fraction (FF), standard deviation of FF (SD-FF), lobar asymmetry, and periportal-to-peripheral gradients were compared across SLD subcategories and steatosis severity levels (L1: mild, L2: moderate, L3: severe).</p> Results <p>The segmentation model achieved: whole-liver DSC: 0.94; left lobe DSC: 0.94; right lobe DSC: 0.96. Compared with ALD and SLD&amp;CHB, MASLD exhibited the highest fat burden (FF: 16.29%) and greatest spatial heterogeneity (SD-FF: 8.22). FF was significantly higher in the right lobe than in the left lobe in MASLD and ALD (both <i>P</i> &lt; .05), whereas no significant lobar difference was observed in SLD&amp;CHB. SD-FF was consistently higher in the left lobe across all SLD subcategories (<i>P</i> &lt; .001), indicating greater heterogeneity of fat distribution in the left lobe. Periportal-to-peripheral gradient analysis revealed peripheral fat enrichment in MASLD and ALD, while the opposite trend in SLD&amp;CHB.</p> Conclusions <p>This study developed a fully automated quantification model for the spatial distribution of whole-liver fat. Characterization of the spatial heterogeneity of hepatic fat accumulation provides additional, phenotypically relevant information across SLD subcategories. These findings highlight the clinical utility of spatial heterogeneity as a novel, noninvasive imaging biomarker for subtype identification and personalized disease assessment of SLD. Moreover, this automated framework offers a scalable and objective tool for future longitudinal monitoring.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Spatial characterization of intrahepatic fat deposition across steatotic liver disease subcategories: a multicenter study

  • Yan-Ci Zhao,
  • Min Wang,
  • Shuzhen Wu,
  • Yuanyuan Bao,
  • Zeyan Wu,
  • Shengze Jin,
  • Yang Cao,
  • Yanyan Zhu,
  • Junhan Pan,
  • Huizhen Huang,
  • Shuhan Liu,
  • Wuyue Chen,
  • Wenbin Ji,
  • Xiaoli Mai,
  • Feng Chen

摘要

Background

Intrahepatic fat accumulation presents spatial heterogeneity, potentially varying across steatotic liver disease (SLD) subcategories. Current whole-liver spatial profiling remains limited. In this study, we systematically evaluated spatial fat distribution patterns in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), alcohol-related liver disease (ALD), and SLD with chronic hepatitis B (SLD&CHB) using a fully automated nnU-Net model for whole-liver segmentation and two-point Dixon MRI-based fat fraction mapping.

Methods

This multicenter retrospective study included the analysis of 682 patients with hepatic steatosis (MASLD: 451; ALD: 89; SLD&CHB: 142) who underwent two-point Dixon MRI. The fully automated nnU-Net-based MRI framework was developed with in-phase (IP), out-phase (OP), water, and fat images, and the model performance was quantified using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) score. The fat fraction (FF), standard deviation of FF (SD-FF), lobar asymmetry, and periportal-to-peripheral gradients were compared across SLD subcategories and steatosis severity levels (L1: mild, L2: moderate, L3: severe).

Results

The segmentation model achieved: whole-liver DSC: 0.94; left lobe DSC: 0.94; right lobe DSC: 0.96. Compared with ALD and SLD&CHB, MASLD exhibited the highest fat burden (FF: 16.29%) and greatest spatial heterogeneity (SD-FF: 8.22). FF was significantly higher in the right lobe than in the left lobe in MASLD and ALD (both P < .05), whereas no significant lobar difference was observed in SLD&CHB. SD-FF was consistently higher in the left lobe across all SLD subcategories (P < .001), indicating greater heterogeneity of fat distribution in the left lobe. Periportal-to-peripheral gradient analysis revealed peripheral fat enrichment in MASLD and ALD, while the opposite trend in SLD&CHB.

Conclusions

This study developed a fully automated quantification model for the spatial distribution of whole-liver fat. Characterization of the spatial heterogeneity of hepatic fat accumulation provides additional, phenotypically relevant information across SLD subcategories. These findings highlight the clinical utility of spatial heterogeneity as a novel, noninvasive imaging biomarker for subtype identification and personalized disease assessment of SLD. Moreover, this automated framework offers a scalable and objective tool for future longitudinal monitoring.