Scholarlink

Background <p>Significant advancements in treatment and care, as well as early detection, have contributed to an increase in cancer survival rates. Recently, the EAT-Lancet Commission on Food, Planet, Health proposed the “planetary health diet” but to date, no study has investigated the potential associations between adherence to the EAT-Lancet reference diet and mortality in cancer survivors. To determine whether higher adherence to the EAT-Lancet reference diet is associated with lower risk for all-cause, cancer, and cardiovascular mortality in cancer survivors.</p> Methods <p>Data from the prospective UK Biobank study were used. Information from UK Biobank’s Touchscreen questionnaire was used to develop a score reflecting adherence to the EAT-Lancet reference diet. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to assess the association of the EAT-Lancet reference diet score with all-cause, cancer, and cardiovascular mortality in cancer survivors.</p> Results <p>Within 25,348 cancer survivors, better adherence to the EAT-Lancet reference diet was inversely related to all-cause mortality (hazard ratio (HR): 0.97, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.95–0.99), 1 unit increase) and cancer mortality (HR: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.96–1.00), while mostly null associations were observed for major cardiovascular mortality (HR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.95–1.03).</p> Conclusions <p>Our findings suggest the adoption of the EAT-Lancet reference diet is associated with lower all-cause and cancer-specific mortality among cancer survivors.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Higher adherence to the EAT-Lancet reference diet is inversely associated with mortality in a UK population of cancer survivors

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年5月13日

查看全文
  • Nena Karavasiloglou,
  • Alysha S. Thompson,
  • Giulia Pestoni,
  • Flurina Suter,
  • Keren Papier,
  • Aedín Cassidy,
  • Tilman Kühn,
  • Sabine Rohrmann

摘要

Background

Significant advancements in treatment and care, as well as early detection, have contributed to an increase in cancer survival rates. Recently, the EAT-Lancet Commission on Food, Planet, Health proposed the “planetary health diet” but to date, no study has investigated the potential associations between adherence to the EAT-Lancet reference diet and mortality in cancer survivors. To determine whether higher adherence to the EAT-Lancet reference diet is associated with lower risk for all-cause, cancer, and cardiovascular mortality in cancer survivors.

Methods

Data from the prospective UK Biobank study were used. Information from UK Biobank’s Touchscreen questionnaire was used to develop a score reflecting adherence to the EAT-Lancet reference diet. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to assess the association of the EAT-Lancet reference diet score with all-cause, cancer, and cardiovascular mortality in cancer survivors.

Results

Within 25,348 cancer survivors, better adherence to the EAT-Lancet reference diet was inversely related to all-cause mortality (hazard ratio (HR): 0.97, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.95–0.99), 1 unit increase) and cancer mortality (HR: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.96–1.00), while mostly null associations were observed for major cardiovascular mortality (HR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.95–1.03).

Conclusions

Our findings suggest the adoption of the EAT-Lancet reference diet is associated with lower all-cause and cancer-specific mortality among cancer survivors.