Scholarlink

Background <p>Human resources for health (HRH) are critical for effective healthcare delivery, particularly in post-conflict settings where health systems face severe challenges. Post-conflict environments often exacerbate pre-existing HRH challenges, such as shortages, poor working conditions, and limited training opportunities. This scoping review aims to identify and synthesize evidence on interventions addressing HRH in post-conflict settings, highlighting strategies, outcomes, and barriers to their implementation.</p> Methods <p>A systematic search was conducted across multiple databases (e.g., PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science) and grey literature sources, including WHO and ReBUILD Consortium reports. Inclusion criteria encompassed quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-method studies, reviews, and guidelines focused on HRH interventions in post-conflict settings published since 1990. Data were charted and analyzed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) framework to identify key themes, interventions, and outcomes.</p> Results <p>The review included 14 studies, comprising primary research and systematic, scoping, and narrative reviews. Key interventions identified include recruitment and deployment strategies, capacity-building programs, incentive schemes, and retention mechanisms. Case studies from Sub-Saharan Africa, Southeast Asia, and the Middle East highlighted innovative policies, such as community-based recruitment and accelerated training programs. Barriers to implementation included political instability, lack of funding, and uncoordinated efforts among stakeholders. Successful initiatives involved long-term planning, local community engagement, and integration with broader health system recovery strategies.</p> Conclusion <p>Effective HRH interventions in post-conflict settings require comprehensive planning, coordination among stakeholders, and sustained investment. Policies should prioritize retention, capacity building, and equitable deployment to rebuild resilient health systems. These findings provide a roadmap for policymakers and practitioners to enhance HRH recovery efforts in similar contexts.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Healing after war/conflict: transformative health workforce strategies for a resilient future: a systematic scoping review

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年7月18日

查看全文
  • Aregawi Gebreyesus,
  • Tesfay Brhane Gebremariam,
  • Mengistu Hagazi Tequare,
  • Samuel Kidane,
  • Mache Tsadik,
  • Measho Gebreslassie Gebregziabher,
  • Mengistu Welday Gebremichael,
  • Leake Gebremeskel,
  • Kalayu Brhane Mruts,
  • Mulu Woldegiorgis,
  • Tilahun Haregu,
  • Alula M. Teklu

摘要

Background

Human resources for health (HRH) are critical for effective healthcare delivery, particularly in post-conflict settings where health systems face severe challenges. Post-conflict environments often exacerbate pre-existing HRH challenges, such as shortages, poor working conditions, and limited training opportunities. This scoping review aims to identify and synthesize evidence on interventions addressing HRH in post-conflict settings, highlighting strategies, outcomes, and barriers to their implementation.

Methods

A systematic search was conducted across multiple databases (e.g., PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science) and grey literature sources, including WHO and ReBUILD Consortium reports. Inclusion criteria encompassed quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-method studies, reviews, and guidelines focused on HRH interventions in post-conflict settings published since 1990. Data were charted and analyzed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) framework to identify key themes, interventions, and outcomes.

Results

The review included 14 studies, comprising primary research and systematic, scoping, and narrative reviews. Key interventions identified include recruitment and deployment strategies, capacity-building programs, incentive schemes, and retention mechanisms. Case studies from Sub-Saharan Africa, Southeast Asia, and the Middle East highlighted innovative policies, such as community-based recruitment and accelerated training programs. Barriers to implementation included political instability, lack of funding, and uncoordinated efforts among stakeholders. Successful initiatives involved long-term planning, local community engagement, and integration with broader health system recovery strategies.

Conclusion

Effective HRH interventions in post-conflict settings require comprehensive planning, coordination among stakeholders, and sustained investment. Policies should prioritize retention, capacity building, and equitable deployment to rebuild resilient health systems. These findings provide a roadmap for policymakers and practitioners to enhance HRH recovery efforts in similar contexts.