Scholarlink

Background <p>Critical Time Intervention (CTI) is an evidence-based, time-limited case management practice that improves housing outcomes among homeless-experienced adults. While CTI’s effect on housing outcomes has been well-studied, its impacts on health services utilization are less clear. In the context of a U.S Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) CTI implementation effort, we assessed relationships between CTI implementation, including fidelity, and Veterans’ VA health services utilization.</p> Methods <p>We conducted a retrospective observational study of 9,051 Veterans who received services, 10/1/2019 to 5/1/2025, from one of 156 case management sites that worked with VA; 32 of these sites implemented CTI. Within the 18 implementing CTI sites that completed fidelity ratings, we compared health services utilization for Veterans (n = 2,022) at sites with adequate (n = 12 sites) vs. inadequate (n = 6 sites) fidelity. We performed multivariate regression using generalized estimating equations with clustering by site, adjusting for Veterans’ demographics and diagnoses, and VA facility complexity. Regression models identified the impacts of CTI (versus non-CTI), and fidelity (adequate versus inadequate), on health service utilization; we used negative binomial regression for count outcomes (number of primary care, emergency department [ED], behavioral health, homeless services, outpatient medical-surgical visits) and logistic regression for binary outcomes (presence of inpatient mental health, or medical-surgical hospitalizations).</p> Results <p>CTI Veterans had lower rates of utilization across all service types compared to non-CTI, including primary care (IRR = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.97–0.98), ED (IRR = 0.93, 95% CI: 0.90–0.95), homeless services (IRR = 0.91, 95%CI: 0.89–0.93) and hospitalizations (AOR = 0.79, 95%CI: 0.68–0.91). Among CTI Veterans, Veterans at sites with adequate fidelity had more primary care use (IRR = 1.04, 95% CI: 1.02–1.07), less ED use (IRR = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.80–0.90) and more homeless service use (IRR = 1.10, 95% CI: 1.05–1.15).</p> Conclusions <p>CTI Veterans had lower service utilization rates compared to non-CTI Veterans. However, adequate CTI fidelity is associated with increased primary care use and decreased ED use; this finding may be due to high-quality CTI implementation and/or site-level characteristics that enabled better CTI fidelity. Ensuring fidelity to CTI implementation may hold value in promoting optimal care linkages for homeless-experienced Veterans and other clients with high needs.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Evaluating the impacts of critical time intervention implementation on health service utilization among homeless-experienced veterans: a retrospective observational study

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年7月3日

查看全文
  • Kimberly S. Clair,
  • Kristina M. Cordasco,
  • Alec Chapman,
  • David A. Ganz,
  • Nicholas Jackson,
  • Ann E. Montgomery,
  • Richard Nelson,
  • Melissa Y. Wei,
  • Erin P. Finley,
  • Sonya Gabrielian

摘要

Background

Critical Time Intervention (CTI) is an evidence-based, time-limited case management practice that improves housing outcomes among homeless-experienced adults. While CTI’s effect on housing outcomes has been well-studied, its impacts on health services utilization are less clear. In the context of a U.S Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) CTI implementation effort, we assessed relationships between CTI implementation, including fidelity, and Veterans’ VA health services utilization.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective observational study of 9,051 Veterans who received services, 10/1/2019 to 5/1/2025, from one of 156 case management sites that worked with VA; 32 of these sites implemented CTI. Within the 18 implementing CTI sites that completed fidelity ratings, we compared health services utilization for Veterans (n = 2,022) at sites with adequate (n = 12 sites) vs. inadequate (n = 6 sites) fidelity. We performed multivariate regression using generalized estimating equations with clustering by site, adjusting for Veterans’ demographics and diagnoses, and VA facility complexity. Regression models identified the impacts of CTI (versus non-CTI), and fidelity (adequate versus inadequate), on health service utilization; we used negative binomial regression for count outcomes (number of primary care, emergency department [ED], behavioral health, homeless services, outpatient medical-surgical visits) and logistic regression for binary outcomes (presence of inpatient mental health, or medical-surgical hospitalizations).

Results

CTI Veterans had lower rates of utilization across all service types compared to non-CTI, including primary care (IRR = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.97–0.98), ED (IRR = 0.93, 95% CI: 0.90–0.95), homeless services (IRR = 0.91, 95%CI: 0.89–0.93) and hospitalizations (AOR = 0.79, 95%CI: 0.68–0.91). Among CTI Veterans, Veterans at sites with adequate fidelity had more primary care use (IRR = 1.04, 95% CI: 1.02–1.07), less ED use (IRR = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.80–0.90) and more homeless service use (IRR = 1.10, 95% CI: 1.05–1.15).

Conclusions

CTI Veterans had lower service utilization rates compared to non-CTI Veterans. However, adequate CTI fidelity is associated with increased primary care use and decreased ED use; this finding may be due to high-quality CTI implementation and/or site-level characteristics that enabled better CTI fidelity. Ensuring fidelity to CTI implementation may hold value in promoting optimal care linkages for homeless-experienced Veterans and other clients with high needs.