Scholarlink

Introduction <p>Strengthening the capacity of primary healthcare (PHC) systems is essential to address the rising burden of non-communicable diseases (NCD) in Bangladesh. The study assessed the readiness of rural PHC facilities in addressing the five World Health Organization (WHO) priority NCDs: diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, chronic respiratory diseases, cervical cancer, and mental health disorders.</p> Methods <p>Between March and April 2024, a cross-sectional survey was conducted in three subdistricts of Dinajpur District, Bangladesh, as a part of a type-2 hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial aimed at evaluating implementation fidelity and examining the process of intervention delivery pertinent to NCD care. All healthcare facilities (government, non-government, and private, ) within the study areas were included. Two existing tools, the WHO Service Availability and Readiness Assessment (SARA) and the Harmonized Health Facility Assessment (HHFA), were adapted to evaluate NCD-specific readiness across four domains: clinical services, staff and guidelines; equipment; diagnostic capacity; and essential medicines. Readiness scores were calculated for each domain, with scores ≥ 70% indicating sufficient preparedness for NCD management.</p> Results <p>Union-level public health facilities (ULPHF) had slightly better overall service readiness (39.6%) than community clinics (CC) (38.7%), while upazila (subdistrict) health complexes (UHC) had the highest overall readiness (82.1%). UHC had the highest readiness for diabetes care (68.2%), particularly in clinical services, staffing, and guidelines (88.9%). The availability of medicines was critically low in CC (0.2%). Equipment for the management of cardiovascular diseases was most available (80.0%), whereas cervical cancer equipment was totally unavailable (0.0%) in ULPHF, CC, and private/NGO facilities. Chronic respiratory disease and cervical cancer diagnostic capacity were totally absent (0.0%) in ULPHF and CC. In mental health service provision, UHC were the most prepared (32.5%), whereas ULPHF were the least prepared (3.3%). None of the facilities achieved the 70% threshold of overall readiness for all five NCDs.</p> Conclusion <p>Findings reveal serious gaps in the readiness of PHC facilities in Bangladesh to respond to NCDs in the four areas. Shortages of trained personnel, absence of standard treatment guidelines, limited diagnostic services, and irregular availability of essential medicines highlight important areas requiring urgent strengthening to enhance PHC readiness and ensure equitable NCD-care provision.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

The readiness of primary healthcare facilities to address non-communicable diseases in rural Bangladesh

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年5月28日

查看全文
  • Tanmoy Sarker,
  • Wubin Xie,
  • Ali Ahsan,
  • Fahmida Akter,
  • Md Mokbul Hossain,
  • Aysha Anan,
  • Jakia Sultana,
  • Ian Goon,
  • Fred Hersch,
  • Zahidul Quayyum,
  • Brian Oldenburg,
  • John Chambers,
  • Malay Kanti Mridha

摘要

Introduction

Strengthening the capacity of primary healthcare (PHC) systems is essential to address the rising burden of non-communicable diseases (NCD) in Bangladesh. The study assessed the readiness of rural PHC facilities in addressing the five World Health Organization (WHO) priority NCDs: diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, chronic respiratory diseases, cervical cancer, and mental health disorders.

Methods

Between March and April 2024, a cross-sectional survey was conducted in three subdistricts of Dinajpur District, Bangladesh, as a part of a type-2 hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial aimed at evaluating implementation fidelity and examining the process of intervention delivery pertinent to NCD care. All healthcare facilities (government, non-government, and private, ) within the study areas were included. Two existing tools, the WHO Service Availability and Readiness Assessment (SARA) and the Harmonized Health Facility Assessment (HHFA), were adapted to evaluate NCD-specific readiness across four domains: clinical services, staff and guidelines; equipment; diagnostic capacity; and essential medicines. Readiness scores were calculated for each domain, with scores ≥ 70% indicating sufficient preparedness for NCD management.

Results

Union-level public health facilities (ULPHF) had slightly better overall service readiness (39.6%) than community clinics (CC) (38.7%), while upazila (subdistrict) health complexes (UHC) had the highest overall readiness (82.1%). UHC had the highest readiness for diabetes care (68.2%), particularly in clinical services, staffing, and guidelines (88.9%). The availability of medicines was critically low in CC (0.2%). Equipment for the management of cardiovascular diseases was most available (80.0%), whereas cervical cancer equipment was totally unavailable (0.0%) in ULPHF, CC, and private/NGO facilities. Chronic respiratory disease and cervical cancer diagnostic capacity were totally absent (0.0%) in ULPHF and CC. In mental health service provision, UHC were the most prepared (32.5%), whereas ULPHF were the least prepared (3.3%). None of the facilities achieved the 70% threshold of overall readiness for all five NCDs.

Conclusion

Findings reveal serious gaps in the readiness of PHC facilities in Bangladesh to respond to NCDs in the four areas. Shortages of trained personnel, absence of standard treatment guidelines, limited diagnostic services, and irregular availability of essential medicines highlight important areas requiring urgent strengthening to enhance PHC readiness and ensure equitable NCD-care provision.