Scholarlink

Background <p>Advance care planning (ACP) is a process that enables individuals to define and communicate their goals and preferences for future medical care, especially in chronic, progressive illnesses such as Parkinson’s disease (PD) and other neurodegenerative disorders. Despite its recognized benefits in improving patient autonomy and end-of-life care outcomes, ACP remains underutilized in India. This study aimed to assess the attitudes and practices of Indian neurologists and geriatricians regarding ACP, identify perceived barriers, and suggest strategies to improve uptake.</p> Methods <p>A mixed-methods approach was employed in this study. In the first phase, a structured online survey was distributed to physicians across India who cared for patients with PD and neurodegenerative disorders. The survey collected demographic information and ACP-related practices, attitudes, and perceived barriers. In the second phase, in-depth qualitative interviews were conducted with a purposively sampled subset of respondents, and inductive thematic analysis was performed to gain deeper insights.</p> Results <p>A total of 140 physicians participated in this survey. Although 93.6% acknowledged the necessity of ACP, only 25% felt they had sufficient time, and 20% felt they had adequate resources for meaningful discussions. Lack of legal clarity (52.1%), training (16.4%), and institutional support (65.7%) were commonly cited as barriers. Qualitative interviews with 15 respondents revealed additional challenges, such as concerns about provoking hopelessness and denial from patients and families. The interviews also revealed that physicians confused ACP with advanced treatment strategies or treatment of advanced disease. Nevertheless, some physicians shared positive experiences, noting that early personalized discussions improved trust and communication, which could facilitate uptake of ACP.</p> Conclusions <p>We identified several systemic, professional, and physician-perceived sociocultural barriers that hinder ACP implementation. To bridge this gap, legal reforms, structured ACP training, and public awareness initiatives are necessary. Tailored culturally sensitive models involving multidisciplinary teams may improve ACP adoption within the Indian context. Future research could explore whether alternative terminology, such as ‘future care planning’, may improve clarity and acceptance in this context and avoid confusion with advanced therapies or treatment of advanced disease.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Barriers and facilitators to advance care planning implementation for patients with neurodegenerative diseases among Indian physicians: a mixed-methods analysis

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年4月29日

查看全文
  • Pavit Singh,
  • K. N. Parvathy,
  • Deepa Dash,
  • Nishkarsh Gupta,
  • Usha Ramanathan,
  • Teneille E. Gofton,
  • Claudia Chou,
  • Soaham Desai,
  • Pramod Kumar Pal,
  • Roopkumar Gursahani,
  • Baikuntha Panigrahi,
  • Banusri Velpandian,
  • Prasun Chatterjee,
  • Avinash Chakrawarty,
  • Anup Singh,
  • Suman Kushwaha,
  • K. P. Divya,
  • Lakshmi Narasimhan Ranganathan,
  • Manjari Tripathi,
  • Deepti Vibha,
  • Rajesh Kumar Singh,
  • Animesh Das,
  • Jasmine Parihar,
  • Sumit Malhotra,
  • Ashish Dutt Upadhyay,
  • Abhishek Pathak,
  • Arunmozhimaran Elavarasi

摘要

Background

Advance care planning (ACP) is a process that enables individuals to define and communicate their goals and preferences for future medical care, especially in chronic, progressive illnesses such as Parkinson’s disease (PD) and other neurodegenerative disorders. Despite its recognized benefits in improving patient autonomy and end-of-life care outcomes, ACP remains underutilized in India. This study aimed to assess the attitudes and practices of Indian neurologists and geriatricians regarding ACP, identify perceived barriers, and suggest strategies to improve uptake.

Methods

A mixed-methods approach was employed in this study. In the first phase, a structured online survey was distributed to physicians across India who cared for patients with PD and neurodegenerative disorders. The survey collected demographic information and ACP-related practices, attitudes, and perceived barriers. In the second phase, in-depth qualitative interviews were conducted with a purposively sampled subset of respondents, and inductive thematic analysis was performed to gain deeper insights.

Results

A total of 140 physicians participated in this survey. Although 93.6% acknowledged the necessity of ACP, only 25% felt they had sufficient time, and 20% felt they had adequate resources for meaningful discussions. Lack of legal clarity (52.1%), training (16.4%), and institutional support (65.7%) were commonly cited as barriers. Qualitative interviews with 15 respondents revealed additional challenges, such as concerns about provoking hopelessness and denial from patients and families. The interviews also revealed that physicians confused ACP with advanced treatment strategies or treatment of advanced disease. Nevertheless, some physicians shared positive experiences, noting that early personalized discussions improved trust and communication, which could facilitate uptake of ACP.

Conclusions

We identified several systemic, professional, and physician-perceived sociocultural barriers that hinder ACP implementation. To bridge this gap, legal reforms, structured ACP training, and public awareness initiatives are necessary. Tailored culturally sensitive models involving multidisciplinary teams may improve ACP adoption within the Indian context. Future research could explore whether alternative terminology, such as ‘future care planning’, may improve clarity and acceptance in this context and avoid confusion with advanced therapies or treatment of advanced disease.