Scholarlink

Background <p>In 2019, China selected 30 cities to pilot diagnosis-related group (DRG) payment reforms nationwide. This study describes the impact of DRG payment reforms on medical expenses, service quality, and efficiency across public hospitals in these pilot cities.</p> Methods <p>One reform pilot city served as the policy implementation group, whereas an adjacent city without DRG reform served as the control group. Data on the demographic and sociological characteristics of inpatients, hospitalization expenses, medical quality, and information from medical records and annual reports of public hospitals in both cities from 2016 to 2022 were collected. A difference-in-differences model was used to analyze the net policy effect of DRG payment reform on medical expenses, quality, and efficiency.</p> Results <p>During the observation period in the pilot city, the implementation of DRG payment reform was associated with reduced total hospitalization costs (β = −0.191, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01), particularly the diagnostic examination (β = −0.276, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01) and treatment (β = −0.476, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01) costs. Concurrently, the reform was correlated with a shortened length of stay (β = −1.625, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01) and decreased antibiotic usage (β = −0.089, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01). Heterogeneity analysis further indicated that the cost containment effect was more pronounced in secondary hospitals than in tertiary hospitals while showing no significant differences in quality-of-care or efficiency metrics. These associations aligned with theoretical expectations; however, further research is warranted to account for potential confounding factors and elucidate the specific pathways of hospital behavioral adjustments to establish causal mechanisms.</p> Conclusion <p>This study indicated that the DRG payment reform might encourage hospitals to optimize medical cost management and adjust the cost structure. However, its impact on improving medical quality and efficiency was relatively limited. Attention should be paid to the potential behavioral responses that may arise from changes in the medical insurance payment method. It is recommended that when implementing the DRG reform, hospitals should strengthen supporting measures, optimize the utilization of insurance funds, improve the diagnosis and treatment process, and continuously monitor the balance between nursing quality and service efficiency.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Impacts of medical insurance payment reform (DRG) on public medical institutions: evidence from pilot cities in China

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年4月21日

查看全文
  • Kan Wu,
  • Hanhong Jiang,
  • Rui Luo,
  • ManLing Nie,
  • Wenli Liu,
  • Jay Pan

摘要

Background

In 2019, China selected 30 cities to pilot diagnosis-related group (DRG) payment reforms nationwide. This study describes the impact of DRG payment reforms on medical expenses, service quality, and efficiency across public hospitals in these pilot cities.

Methods

One reform pilot city served as the policy implementation group, whereas an adjacent city without DRG reform served as the control group. Data on the demographic and sociological characteristics of inpatients, hospitalization expenses, medical quality, and information from medical records and annual reports of public hospitals in both cities from 2016 to 2022 were collected. A difference-in-differences model was used to analyze the net policy effect of DRG payment reform on medical expenses, quality, and efficiency.

Results

During the observation period in the pilot city, the implementation of DRG payment reform was associated with reduced total hospitalization costs (β = −0.191, p < 0.01), particularly the diagnostic examination (β = −0.276, p < 0.01) and treatment (β = −0.476, p < 0.01) costs. Concurrently, the reform was correlated with a shortened length of stay (β = −1.625, p < 0.01) and decreased antibiotic usage (β = −0.089, p < 0.01). Heterogeneity analysis further indicated that the cost containment effect was more pronounced in secondary hospitals than in tertiary hospitals while showing no significant differences in quality-of-care or efficiency metrics. These associations aligned with theoretical expectations; however, further research is warranted to account for potential confounding factors and elucidate the specific pathways of hospital behavioral adjustments to establish causal mechanisms.

Conclusion

This study indicated that the DRG payment reform might encourage hospitals to optimize medical cost management and adjust the cost structure. However, its impact on improving medical quality and efficiency was relatively limited. Attention should be paid to the potential behavioral responses that may arise from changes in the medical insurance payment method. It is recommended that when implementing the DRG reform, hospitals should strengthen supporting measures, optimize the utilization of insurance funds, improve the diagnosis and treatment process, and continuously monitor the balance between nursing quality and service efficiency.