Scholarlink

Background <p>Provider autonomy is increasingly asserted as an important attribute in health systems, but is rarely interrogated in-depth, particularly at primary care level. This article aimed to examine the current state of evidence on the role of financial autonomy in primary care, focusing on the public sector in low- and middle-income settings (LMICs), and develop a typology and conceptual framework based on it.</p> Methods <p>The article draws on mixed methods, including a scoping review of the literature (91 documents), 12 expert interviews and the knowledge of the research team. Findings were also discussed with health financing and public financial management experts at a global meeting in 2023 to deepen the reflections.</p> Results <p>In the article, we examine the reforms which have been associated with triggering or at least raising the profile of financial autonomy at primary care level as an important attribute, including strategic purchasing reforms, decentralisation and public financial management (PFM) changes. We highlight important considerations for design and implementation of financial autonomy at primary care level and propose an evidence-based typology structured by the budget cycle, which defines specific dimensions of financial autonomy along a continuum. Finally, we examine what evidence exists on the impacts of financial autonomy and develop a conceptual framework to highlight key considerations in terms of contextual influencers of financial autonomy, prerequisites for it to be deployed, and the potential positive and negative effects of financial autonomy at primary care level. This can be used to encourage future research and inform reform processes in this area.</p> Conclusion <p>We conclude that financial autonomy at primary care level can contribute to facility performance, if tailored to contextual factors and supported by accountability mechanisms. However, while financial autonomy is prima facie a positive attribute, the understanding of autonomy over what, for which purposes and by whom is still not clearly addressed in the literature, along with the implications for purchasing and PFM (which is key to enable financial autonomy, as well as being affected by it). This is the first study to our knowledge providing an in-depth understanding of provider financial autonomy at primary care level in LMICs, and moves the field forward with its typology and conceptual framework.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Financial autonomy of facilities providing primary care services in low- and middle-income countries: assessing the evidence to inform the development of a typology and conceptual framework

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年12月15日

查看全文
  • Sophie Witter,
  • Maria Paola Bertone,
  • Lucas Sempé,
  • Quentin Baglione,
  • Hélène Barroy,
  • Justine Hsu,
  • Inke Mathauer

摘要

Background

Provider autonomy is increasingly asserted as an important attribute in health systems, but is rarely interrogated in-depth, particularly at primary care level. This article aimed to examine the current state of evidence on the role of financial autonomy in primary care, focusing on the public sector in low- and middle-income settings (LMICs), and develop a typology and conceptual framework based on it.

Methods

The article draws on mixed methods, including a scoping review of the literature (91 documents), 12 expert interviews and the knowledge of the research team. Findings were also discussed with health financing and public financial management experts at a global meeting in 2023 to deepen the reflections.

Results

In the article, we examine the reforms which have been associated with triggering or at least raising the profile of financial autonomy at primary care level as an important attribute, including strategic purchasing reforms, decentralisation and public financial management (PFM) changes. We highlight important considerations for design and implementation of financial autonomy at primary care level and propose an evidence-based typology structured by the budget cycle, which defines specific dimensions of financial autonomy along a continuum. Finally, we examine what evidence exists on the impacts of financial autonomy and develop a conceptual framework to highlight key considerations in terms of contextual influencers of financial autonomy, prerequisites for it to be deployed, and the potential positive and negative effects of financial autonomy at primary care level. This can be used to encourage future research and inform reform processes in this area.

Conclusion

We conclude that financial autonomy at primary care level can contribute to facility performance, if tailored to contextual factors and supported by accountability mechanisms. However, while financial autonomy is prima facie a positive attribute, the understanding of autonomy over what, for which purposes and by whom is still not clearly addressed in the literature, along with the implications for purchasing and PFM (which is key to enable financial autonomy, as well as being affected by it). This is the first study to our knowledge providing an in-depth understanding of provider financial autonomy at primary care level in LMICs, and moves the field forward with its typology and conceptual framework.