Background <p>Research capacity building programs, such as the Research Ready Grant Program (RRGP), are important methods of engaging clinicians in research knowledge and processes. Understanding the experiences and perceptions of clinicians who engage with such programs is important, as they provide valuable insights into the design and approach of research capability building programs.</p> Methods <p>Under the framework of the New World Kirkpatrick Model of evaluation, this study adopted a descriptive qualitative approach and used semi-structured interviews to explore the experiences of clinicians who engaged with the RRGP. The aims were to identify the components of the program that facilitate clinicians’ capacity to participate in the research processes. One member of each funded research team from the RRGP 2022 cohort was interviewed (<i>n</i> = 6). Interview transcripts were thematically analysed.</p> Results <p>Thematic analysis found that RRGP provided just in time learning, leveraging current clinical issues to engage clinicians, and provide experiential learning which demystified research processes. In the regional setting, the RRGP allowed clinicians to think globally, but to apply research to their local setting.</p> Conclusion <p>The RRGP provides a vehicle for change to facilitate learning and offers opportunities for clinicians to engage in research. Facilitating collaboration, quarantining time and space for research and balancing work, life and research time are important elements to consider when implementing research capability programs.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Clinicians’ experience of the research ready grant program: just-in-time learning to facilitate regional research capacity

  • Pauline Calleja,
  • Tracey Flenady,
  • Amy-Louise Byrne,
  • Lisa Wirihana,
  • Andrea Scott,
  • Pammie Ellem,
  • Luke Ryan,
  • Ashlyn Sahay

摘要

Background

Research capacity building programs, such as the Research Ready Grant Program (RRGP), are important methods of engaging clinicians in research knowledge and processes. Understanding the experiences and perceptions of clinicians who engage with such programs is important, as they provide valuable insights into the design and approach of research capability building programs.

Methods

Under the framework of the New World Kirkpatrick Model of evaluation, this study adopted a descriptive qualitative approach and used semi-structured interviews to explore the experiences of clinicians who engaged with the RRGP. The aims were to identify the components of the program that facilitate clinicians’ capacity to participate in the research processes. One member of each funded research team from the RRGP 2022 cohort was interviewed (n = 6). Interview transcripts were thematically analysed.

Results

Thematic analysis found that RRGP provided just in time learning, leveraging current clinical issues to engage clinicians, and provide experiential learning which demystified research processes. In the regional setting, the RRGP allowed clinicians to think globally, but to apply research to their local setting.

Conclusion

The RRGP provides a vehicle for change to facilitate learning and offers opportunities for clinicians to engage in research. Facilitating collaboration, quarantining time and space for research and balancing work, life and research time are important elements to consider when implementing research capability programs.