Scholarlink

Background <p>On-the-day surgery cancellations (OTDSCs) have been a longstanding global problem, bringing significant suffering to patients and carers, and substantial waste across healthcare systems. Any cancellation of a surgery that occurs for any reason on the day of the scheduled surgery is defined as an OTDSC. Despite the high prevalence of OTDSCs, little is known about why they happen and how to minimise them. This study aimed to develop Initial Program Theories (IPTs) and share valuable insights that can form the basis for future evaluation of OTDSCs.</p> Method <p>We conducted a study to address the questions, “How do OTDSCs occur, and in what contexts can they be minimised?“. We used a qualitative and multi-stage approach to developing IPTs. Data collection included OTDSC literature (<i>n</i> = 35) identified from a systematic search, including feedback sessions with administrators (<i>n</i> = 10) from eight NHS trusts, two feedback events with patient expert advisers (<i>n</i> = 6), and expert practitioners (<i>n</i> = 8).</p> Results <p>The iterative analysis found that OTDSCs are a complex undesired outcome, influenced by many interconnected “variables” at macro-level (e.g., waiting-list policies, austerity measures and workforce shortages) and meso-level (e.g., workload, high emergency admissions and interruptions), as well as healthcare professionals’ (HCPs) and patients’ perceptions and behaviours. The study identified that failures in various aspects of individualised care (such as care planning, communication and resource allocation) in preparing for surgery before admission could also contribute to different types of OTDSCs.</p> Conclusion <p>As a result of the complex and interconnected nature of OTDSCs and the wide variety of causes, it can be hard to reduce their occurrence. OTDSCs can be minimised by carefully considering various aspects of individualisation of care, such as clinical care planning, communication and resource allocation and delivery when preparing patients to undergo surgery. Providing favourable working conditions and creating effective knowledge transfer between the stakeholders initiating OTDSCs and HCPs who prepare patients for surgery can be critical to minimising most OTDSCs. The study developed a taxonomy and novel IPTs that have practical implications for policymakers and practitioners when designing interventions to minimise OTDSCs.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Building an initial programme theory to explain how and why on-the-day surgery cancellations occur and how they might be reduced

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年11月5日

查看全文
  • Buddhika S. W. Samarasinghe,
  • Ross Millar,
  • Mark Exworthy,
  • Justin Aunger

摘要

Background

On-the-day surgery cancellations (OTDSCs) have been a longstanding global problem, bringing significant suffering to patients and carers, and substantial waste across healthcare systems. Any cancellation of a surgery that occurs for any reason on the day of the scheduled surgery is defined as an OTDSC. Despite the high prevalence of OTDSCs, little is known about why they happen and how to minimise them. This study aimed to develop Initial Program Theories (IPTs) and share valuable insights that can form the basis for future evaluation of OTDSCs.

Method

We conducted a study to address the questions, “How do OTDSCs occur, and in what contexts can they be minimised?“. We used a qualitative and multi-stage approach to developing IPTs. Data collection included OTDSC literature (n = 35) identified from a systematic search, including feedback sessions with administrators (n = 10) from eight NHS trusts, two feedback events with patient expert advisers (n = 6), and expert practitioners (n = 8).

Results

The iterative analysis found that OTDSCs are a complex undesired outcome, influenced by many interconnected “variables” at macro-level (e.g., waiting-list policies, austerity measures and workforce shortages) and meso-level (e.g., workload, high emergency admissions and interruptions), as well as healthcare professionals’ (HCPs) and patients’ perceptions and behaviours. The study identified that failures in various aspects of individualised care (such as care planning, communication and resource allocation) in preparing for surgery before admission could also contribute to different types of OTDSCs.

Conclusion

As a result of the complex and interconnected nature of OTDSCs and the wide variety of causes, it can be hard to reduce their occurrence. OTDSCs can be minimised by carefully considering various aspects of individualisation of care, such as clinical care planning, communication and resource allocation and delivery when preparing patients to undergo surgery. Providing favourable working conditions and creating effective knowledge transfer between the stakeholders initiating OTDSCs and HCPs who prepare patients for surgery can be critical to minimising most OTDSCs. The study developed a taxonomy and novel IPTs that have practical implications for policymakers and practitioners when designing interventions to minimise OTDSCs.