Scholarlink

Background <p>Transforming healthcare related work processes through digitization may help to address the growing demands placed on employees by enhancing user satisfaction and may have an impact on patient safety and treatment quality. Hereby, different approaches reaching from multimodal, workflow-specific systems to more uniform and comprehensive formats have been introduced.</p> Objectives <p>To date, few comparative studies have examined different Health Information System (HIS) approaches from the perspective of healthcare workers. This study aims to evaluate perceived usability, quality, and compliance of two distinct clinical HIS types.</p> Methods <p>In this cross-sectional, bicentric study, we compared a multimodal HIS platform with a variation of different digital systems to a uniform, customized HIS solution that was specifically programmed for Otorhinolaryngology, across two university hospital departments in Germany. A total of <i>n</i> = 57 participants (physicians and nurses) completed a 61-item standardized questionnaire. Group differences were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test.</p> Results <p>Healthcare professionals using the multimodal HIS reported significantly lower overall satisfaction, perceived patient safety and treatment quality compared to those using the customized HIS. The latter system was also rated more positively regarding usability and workflow support. Currently, particularly in Germany, significant efforts are needed across all hierarchical levels to establish a cohesive and clear digital HIS with inter-professional, -institutional, -sectional abilities.</p> Conclusion <p>Our study highlights the perceived advantages of a more uniform and customized HIS from the user’s perspective in healthcare, suggesting that these systems could enhance both staff satisfaction and the quality of care.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Bicentric evaluation of employee satisfaction, patient safety and treatment quality: comparing different Health Information System (HIS) solutions

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年11月17日

查看全文
  • Matthias Brand,
  • Felix Boehm,
  • Udo X. Kaisers,
  • Patrick Fehling,
  • Thomas K. Hoffmann,
  • Nicole Rotter,
  • Sonja Ludwig,
  • Marie-Nicole Theodoraki

摘要

Background

Transforming healthcare related work processes through digitization may help to address the growing demands placed on employees by enhancing user satisfaction and may have an impact on patient safety and treatment quality. Hereby, different approaches reaching from multimodal, workflow-specific systems to more uniform and comprehensive formats have been introduced.

Objectives

To date, few comparative studies have examined different Health Information System (HIS) approaches from the perspective of healthcare workers. This study aims to evaluate perceived usability, quality, and compliance of two distinct clinical HIS types.

Methods

In this cross-sectional, bicentric study, we compared a multimodal HIS platform with a variation of different digital systems to a uniform, customized HIS solution that was specifically programmed for Otorhinolaryngology, across two university hospital departments in Germany. A total of n = 57 participants (physicians and nurses) completed a 61-item standardized questionnaire. Group differences were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test.

Results

Healthcare professionals using the multimodal HIS reported significantly lower overall satisfaction, perceived patient safety and treatment quality compared to those using the customized HIS. The latter system was also rated more positively regarding usability and workflow support. Currently, particularly in Germany, significant efforts are needed across all hierarchical levels to establish a cohesive and clear digital HIS with inter-professional, -institutional, -sectional abilities.

Conclusion

Our study highlights the perceived advantages of a more uniform and customized HIS from the user’s perspective in healthcare, suggesting that these systems could enhance both staff satisfaction and the quality of care.