Scholarlink

Background <p>Trauma-informed care (TIC) is a framework that recognizes the pervasive impact of trauma, aiming to enhance both patient outcomes and provider well-being. Given the high prevalence of trauma among individuals seeking healthcare, it is essential for healthcare providers (HCPs) to be trauma informed. However, standardized TIC curricula for training healthcare staff are lacking. This study assessed perceptions towards TIC among multidisciplinary HCPs, patients, and leadership staff at two urban hospitals in Canada.</p> Methods <p>This mixed-methods prospective cross-sectional study employed Kern’s six-step approach for curriculum development. A needs assessment was conducted via an online questionnaire for HCPs and semi-structed interviews with individuals from the three participant groups: HCPs, patients, and leadership staff. The questionnaire assessed knowledge, skills, and attitudes regarding TIC. Semi-structured interviews explored perspectives on TIC, including curriculum priorities and potential implementation barriers. Findings informed the development of a virtual TIC curriculum, with iterative feedback collected to refine and assess its acceptability.</p> Results <p>Among 106 HCP questionnaire respondents including Medical Doctors, Social Workers and Registered Nurses, 96 (90.6%) identified as women, and 97 (91.5%) as providers of direct patient care. Despite 93 (87.7%) having prior TIC education, 77 (72.6%) reported low confidence in applying TIC knowledge in clinical practice. Key perceived challenges to TIC training implementation included time constraints and lack of standardization across disciplines. A multimedia, self-paced course was the preferred solution. Thematic analysis of interviews with 28 participants (10 HCPs, 10 patients, 8 leadership staff) revealed six major themes: healthcare interactions, TIC implementation, training needs, system level barriers, curriculum preferences, and systems level improvements. Participants underscored the risk of re-traumatization to patients in healthcare settings without TIC and emphasized the need for universal TIC training for all staff.</p> Conclusion <p>This study revealed a strong interest in a TIC course for multidisciplinary HCPs, supports the translation of knowledge into practice and incorporates a focus on cultural humility. Integrating insights from key stakeholders in this needs assessment phase resulted in the development of a TIC curriculum inclusive of diverse voices and viewpoints and strengthened the understanding of contextual factors that will support effective TIC implementation.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

A cross-sectional needs assessment for a trauma-informed care curriculum for multidisciplinary healthcare providers

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年3月24日

查看全文
  • Dana C. Ross,
  • Kaniz Fatema Farhat,
  • Negar Sayrafizadeh,
  • Annie K. Truuvert,
  • Louloua Ashikhusein Waliji,
  • Mahum Musheer,
  • Julie Blair,
  • Lesley Hughes,
  • Sue MacRae,
  • Simone N. Vigod,
  • Sophie Soklaridis,
  • Nancy McCallum

摘要

Background

Trauma-informed care (TIC) is a framework that recognizes the pervasive impact of trauma, aiming to enhance both patient outcomes and provider well-being. Given the high prevalence of trauma among individuals seeking healthcare, it is essential for healthcare providers (HCPs) to be trauma informed. However, standardized TIC curricula for training healthcare staff are lacking. This study assessed perceptions towards TIC among multidisciplinary HCPs, patients, and leadership staff at two urban hospitals in Canada.

Methods

This mixed-methods prospective cross-sectional study employed Kern’s six-step approach for curriculum development. A needs assessment was conducted via an online questionnaire for HCPs and semi-structed interviews with individuals from the three participant groups: HCPs, patients, and leadership staff. The questionnaire assessed knowledge, skills, and attitudes regarding TIC. Semi-structured interviews explored perspectives on TIC, including curriculum priorities and potential implementation barriers. Findings informed the development of a virtual TIC curriculum, with iterative feedback collected to refine and assess its acceptability.

Results

Among 106 HCP questionnaire respondents including Medical Doctors, Social Workers and Registered Nurses, 96 (90.6%) identified as women, and 97 (91.5%) as providers of direct patient care. Despite 93 (87.7%) having prior TIC education, 77 (72.6%) reported low confidence in applying TIC knowledge in clinical practice. Key perceived challenges to TIC training implementation included time constraints and lack of standardization across disciplines. A multimedia, self-paced course was the preferred solution. Thematic analysis of interviews with 28 participants (10 HCPs, 10 patients, 8 leadership staff) revealed six major themes: healthcare interactions, TIC implementation, training needs, system level barriers, curriculum preferences, and systems level improvements. Participants underscored the risk of re-traumatization to patients in healthcare settings without TIC and emphasized the need for universal TIC training for all staff.

Conclusion

This study revealed a strong interest in a TIC course for multidisciplinary HCPs, supports the translation of knowledge into practice and incorporates a focus on cultural humility. Integrating insights from key stakeholders in this needs assessment phase resulted in the development of a TIC curriculum inclusive of diverse voices and viewpoints and strengthened the understanding of contextual factors that will support effective TIC implementation.