Scholarlink

Background <p>Community Health Centers (CHCs) are a vital part of the health safety net, providing high quality care to underserved communities with complex health and social needs. Yet, despite their crucial role, CHCs operate on slim financial margins, relying in part on grant funding streams. Little is known about the role that grant requirements have in directing the functioning of CHCs.</p> Methods <p>We conducted qualitative thematic analysis, based on 56 semi-structured interviews of CHC leadership and staff in New York City.</p> Results <p>Three overarching themes described ways that CHCs are hampered by the designs and requirements of grant funding: 1) narrowness of available funding, 2) lack of access to operational funding, and 3) inability to utilize available funding to address workforce needs.</p> Conclusions <p>Our analysis illuminates the tension between the weighty charge placed on CHCs as key pillars of the health safety net and the inflexible grant funding mechanisms available to sustain them. Restrictive funding limits CHCs’ capacity to deliver comprehensive care and meet community needs.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

The problem of programmatic funding: flexibility challenges for community health centers

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年2月13日

查看全文
  • Emily Burroughs,
  • Sorcha A. Brophy,
  • Thalia Porteny

摘要

Background

Community Health Centers (CHCs) are a vital part of the health safety net, providing high quality care to underserved communities with complex health and social needs. Yet, despite their crucial role, CHCs operate on slim financial margins, relying in part on grant funding streams. Little is known about the role that grant requirements have in directing the functioning of CHCs.

Methods

We conducted qualitative thematic analysis, based on 56 semi-structured interviews of CHC leadership and staff in New York City.

Results

Three overarching themes described ways that CHCs are hampered by the designs and requirements of grant funding: 1) narrowness of available funding, 2) lack of access to operational funding, and 3) inability to utilize available funding to address workforce needs.

Conclusions

Our analysis illuminates the tension between the weighty charge placed on CHCs as key pillars of the health safety net and the inflexible grant funding mechanisms available to sustain them. Restrictive funding limits CHCs’ capacity to deliver comprehensive care and meet community needs.