Scholarlink

Background <p>Specialists review referrals for appropriateness and urgency. Limited capacity results in specialists declining referrals leaving primary care providers (PCP), patients, and specialists frustrated. Since specialist availability is unlikely to improve significantly, innovative solutions are required. This study evaluated the feasibility, acceptability, safety and impact of a new referral triage option Triaging Referrals to eConsult (TReC) which enables specialists to provide advice in lieu of an appointment (advice only) or provide advice to support the PCP until the appointment occurs (advice and appointment).</p> Methods <p>Utilization metrics were prospectively collected (number (%) of referrals converted, time from receipt of referral to completion (response time) and specialist self-reported billing time.</p> <p>To assess PCP opinions on safety (advice was clearly identified and actionable) and acceptability (comfort in patient not seeing a specialist, additional time burden and support for expansion) two surveys, one for those referrals triaged to advice only and another for those triaged to advice and appointment, were faxed 14&#xa0;days after the referral response.</p> Results <p>From November 1, 2022, to October 31, 2023, five specialties converted 930/16,880 referrals—656 (3.8%) to <i>Advice Only</i> and 274 (1.6%) to <i>Advice and Appointment</i> for an overall conversion rate of 5.5%. 192/1010 (19%) PCPs returned the survey with over 80% agreeing that the advice was easily recognizable, conversion to eConsult was acceptable and the advice was helpful and actionable.</p> Interpretation <p>Enabling specialists to provide advice to PCPs, often in lieu of an appointment, was acceptable, feasible with no major patient safety concerns.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Specialists Triaging Referrals to eConsult: a feasibility study including acceptability and impact of providing advice on primary health care providers

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年2月6日

查看全文
  • Ridha Ali,
  • Geetha Mukerji,
  • Susan Humphrey-Murto,
  • Clare Liddy,
  • Heather Lochnan,
  • Erin Keely

摘要

Background

Specialists review referrals for appropriateness and urgency. Limited capacity results in specialists declining referrals leaving primary care providers (PCP), patients, and specialists frustrated. Since specialist availability is unlikely to improve significantly, innovative solutions are required. This study evaluated the feasibility, acceptability, safety and impact of a new referral triage option Triaging Referrals to eConsult (TReC) which enables specialists to provide advice in lieu of an appointment (advice only) or provide advice to support the PCP until the appointment occurs (advice and appointment).

Methods

Utilization metrics were prospectively collected (number (%) of referrals converted, time from receipt of referral to completion (response time) and specialist self-reported billing time.

To assess PCP opinions on safety (advice was clearly identified and actionable) and acceptability (comfort in patient not seeing a specialist, additional time burden and support for expansion) two surveys, one for those referrals triaged to advice only and another for those triaged to advice and appointment, were faxed 14 days after the referral response.

Results

From November 1, 2022, to October 31, 2023, five specialties converted 930/16,880 referrals—656 (3.8%) to Advice Only and 274 (1.6%) to Advice and Appointment for an overall conversion rate of 5.5%. 192/1010 (19%) PCPs returned the survey with over 80% agreeing that the advice was easily recognizable, conversion to eConsult was acceptable and the advice was helpful and actionable.

Interpretation

Enabling specialists to provide advice to PCPs, often in lieu of an appointment, was acceptable, feasible with no major patient safety concerns.