Background Patient safety is a global priority and a core component of nursing education. Competence in this area encompasses cognitive, behavioral, and sociocultural skills such as teamwork, communication, risk management, and recognition of adverse events. The Health Professional Education in Patient Safety Survey (H-PEPSS) is an internationally validated tool designed to measure students’ self-perceived competencies in both classroom and clinical settings. To date, no validation of the H-PEPSS has been reported in Eastern Europe. Therefore, this study aimed to examine factor validity, reliability, and cross-setting measurement equivalence of the Slovak version of the H-PEPSS (H-PEPSSSVK) and to examine nursing students’ perceived patient safety competencies across classroom and clinical learning environments. Methods This cross-sectional validation study was conducted between February and December 2024 across all nine Slovak public universities offering nursing programs. A total of 1,017 students completed the H-PEPSSSVK. The data were analyzed via confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to test competing models, multi-group CFA (MG-CFA) to assess measurement invariance across the classroom and clinical settings, and reliability analysis (McDonald’s omega). Related samples nonparametric test was used to compare the scores across the two settings. Results The modified six-factor correlated model showed the best fit (RMSEA = 0.058; CFI ≥ 0.952; SRMR = 0.030), supporting the instrument’s theoretical structure. Strong factor loadings (0.686–0.852) and high inter-factor correlations (r = .686–0.857) together with HTMT values < 0.85 confirmed construct validity. The MG-CFA demonstrated configural, metric, scalar, and strict invariance, validating the instrument’s equivalence across the classroom and clinical settings. Reliability was excellent (ω > 0.70 for all domains; total scale ω = 0.95). Paired comparisons revealed small and significantly higher classroom scores in three domains, highlighting a persistent theory–practice gap. Conclusions The H-PEPSSSVK is a valid, reliable, and contextually appropriate tool for assessing Slovak nursing students’ perceived patient safety competencies. Its use can support curriculum evaluation, educational reform, and international benchmarking, thereby contributing to safer patient care in Slovakia and beyond. Clinical trial number Not applicable.

Perceived patient safety competencies among Slovak nursing students: a psychometric analysis

期刊论文
出版模式：

开放获取
发表日期：

2026年2月5日

查看全文

Dominika Kohanová,
Andrea Sollárová,
Tomáš Sollár

摘要

Background

Patient safety is a global priority and a core component of nursing education. Competence in this area encompasses cognitive, behavioral, and sociocultural skills such as teamwork, communication, risk management, and recognition of adverse events. The Health Professional Education in Patient Safety Survey (H-PEPSS) is an internationally validated tool designed to measure students’ self-perceived competencies in both classroom and clinical settings. To date, no validation of the H-PEPSS has been reported in Eastern Europe. Therefore, this study aimed to examine factor validity, reliability, and cross-setting measurement equivalence of the Slovak version of the H-PEPSS (H-PEPSS_SVK) and to examine nursing students’ perceived patient safety competencies across classroom and clinical learning environments.

Methods

This cross-sectional validation study was conducted between February and December 2024 across all nine Slovak public universities offering nursing programs. A total of 1,017 students completed the H-PEPSS_SVK. The data were analyzed via confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to test competing models, multi-group CFA (MG-CFA) to assess measurement invariance across the classroom and clinical settings, and reliability analysis (McDonald’s omega). Related samples nonparametric test was used to compare the scores across the two settings.

Results

The modified six-factor correlated model showed the best fit (RMSEA = 0.058; CFI ≥ 0.952; SRMR = 0.030), supporting the instrument’s theoretical structure. Strong factor loadings (0.686–0.852) and high inter-factor correlations (r = .686–0.857) together with HTMT values < 0.85 confirmed construct validity. The MG-CFA demonstrated configural, metric, scalar, and strict invariance, validating the instrument’s equivalence across the classroom and clinical settings. Reliability was excellent (ω > 0.70 for all domains; total scale ω = 0.95). Paired comparisons revealed small and significantly higher classroom scores in three domains, highlighting a persistent theory–practice gap.

Conclusions

The H-PEPSS_SVK is a valid, reliable, and contextually appropriate tool for assessing Slovak nursing students’ perceived patient safety competencies. Its use can support curriculum evaluation, educational reform, and international benchmarking, thereby contributing to safer patient care in Slovakia and beyond.

Clinical trial number

Not applicable.