Scholarlink

Background <p>High-quality routine health information (RHI) is essential for evidence-based decision-making and healthcare quality improvement. However, existing studies in Ethiopia have reported low data quality, especially at district health offices and primary healthcare facilities. Moreover, there is limited evidence comparing RHI quality across different facility types and identifying context-specific factors influencing data quality. To address these the study assesses and compares RHI quality and its associated factors in primary healthcare facilities of Eastern Tigray, Ethiopia.</p> Methods <p>A comparative cross-sectional study was conducted in selected health facilities in Eastern Tigray. Simple random sampling was used to select woredas, and 224 departments were assessed. Data were collected using structured questionnaires, observation checklists, and registry reviews. Descriptive statistics and ordinal logistic regression were employed to analyze routine health information quality and associated factors using STATA version 15. The significance level was set at p-value &lt; 0.05 with a 95% confidence interval.</p> Result <p>Only 13.4% of health facility departments met the national standards for routine health information quality. Project support was significantly associated with better data quality (<i>X</i>² = 14.70, <i>p</i> = 0.001). In unsupported facilities, training on health information systems (AOR = 2.17, 95% CI: 1.02–4.64), display of targets (AOR = 2.85, 95% CI: 1.10–7.75), feedback (AOR = 2.84, 95% CI: 1.27–6.35), and perception of RHI importance (AOR = 5.33, 95% CI: 1.40–20.25) were significantly associated with quality. In supported facilities, supervision was a key factor (AOR = 3.81, 95% CI: 1.66–12.43).</p> Conclusion <p>Routine health information quality was below national standards and WHO threshold, with health centers performing worse than hospitals. Support from projects, training, supervision, and feedback were associated with improved data quality. Strengthening training, monitoring, and written feedback across health system levels is recommended.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Comparing routine health information quality and associated factors among health facilities in the eastern zone of Tigray, Ethiopia, 2019/20: a cross-sectional study

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年3月23日

查看全文
  • Shimuye Nigusse Abreha,
  • Letekirstos Gebreegziabher Gebretsadik,
  • Teklit Gebretsadik Gebrehiwot

摘要

Background

High-quality routine health information (RHI) is essential for evidence-based decision-making and healthcare quality improvement. However, existing studies in Ethiopia have reported low data quality, especially at district health offices and primary healthcare facilities. Moreover, there is limited evidence comparing RHI quality across different facility types and identifying context-specific factors influencing data quality. To address these the study assesses and compares RHI quality and its associated factors in primary healthcare facilities of Eastern Tigray, Ethiopia.

Methods

A comparative cross-sectional study was conducted in selected health facilities in Eastern Tigray. Simple random sampling was used to select woredas, and 224 departments were assessed. Data were collected using structured questionnaires, observation checklists, and registry reviews. Descriptive statistics and ordinal logistic regression were employed to analyze routine health information quality and associated factors using STATA version 15. The significance level was set at p-value < 0.05 with a 95% confidence interval.

Result

Only 13.4% of health facility departments met the national standards for routine health information quality. Project support was significantly associated with better data quality (X² = 14.70, p = 0.001). In unsupported facilities, training on health information systems (AOR = 2.17, 95% CI: 1.02–4.64), display of targets (AOR = 2.85, 95% CI: 1.10–7.75), feedback (AOR = 2.84, 95% CI: 1.27–6.35), and perception of RHI importance (AOR = 5.33, 95% CI: 1.40–20.25) were significantly associated with quality. In supported facilities, supervision was a key factor (AOR = 3.81, 95% CI: 1.66–12.43).

Conclusion

Routine health information quality was below national standards and WHO threshold, with health centers performing worse than hospitals. Support from projects, training, supervision, and feedback were associated with improved data quality. Strengthening training, monitoring, and written feedback across health system levels is recommended.