<p>This study examines provider ethical responsibility in response to patient impoliteness in clinical encounters through the lens of Levinas’s phenomenological ethics. Drawing on Levinas’s philosophy of the “face-to-face” encounter, we argue that such moments of impoliteness can be interpreted not simply as breaches of civility but as expressions of vulnerability that call for ethical responsiveness—an interpretation that transforms how providers might understand and engage with conflictive interactions. Building on this perspective, we propose an Ethical Responsibility Framework organized around three orienting principles—Recognition of Vulnerability, Orientation toward the Other, and Commitment to Dignity—which translate Levinasian ethical insights into interpretive guidance for clinical communication. The framework is presented as a set of heuristic orientations that cultivate ethical attention while acknowledging that responsibility is always mediated by what Levinas calls the “third party”—the presence of multiple Others who introduce the necessity of justice, comparison, and institutional constraints. We address how infinite responsibility is necessarily complicated by considerations of resource allocation, competing patient claims, and provider well-being, drawing on recent scholarship that extends Levinas’s thought into political and institutional domains. Responding to critiques that Levinasian ethics risks rendering the subject a “hostage” and lacks a robust account of political mediation, we demonstrate that Levinasian ethics, properly understood, requires not self-sacrifice without limit but reflective mediation within institutional contexts that distribute and support ethical practice. By reframing patient impoliteness as a possible manifestation of vulnerability within asymmetrical clinical relationships, this study contributes to research on impoliteness in healthcare communication and to philosophical discussions on the application of phenomenological ethics to medical practice.</p>