Scholarlink

Objective <p>This study aimed to explore Emergency Medical Services (EMS) providers’ perceptions of prehospital Point-of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS), including perceived usefulness, facilitators, and barriers to its implementing in Jordanian prehospital settings.</p> Methods <p>A multicenter cross-sectional study was conducted among EMS providers using a structured questionnaire. Attitudes were measured using a four-point Likert scale, while facilitators and barriers were assessed with dichotomous (yes/no) responses. A total attitude score was calculated by summing Likert-scale responses. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize responses and inferential analyses (independent-samples t-tests and ANOVA) were conducted to examine group differences. Internal consistency was evaluated using Cronbach’s alpha and Kuder–Richardson Formula 20 (KR-20).</p> Results <p>A total of 621 participants were included in the study. The majority were males (78.3%), with a mean age of 29.5 ± 4.4 years and EMS experience of 9.7 ± 4.6 years. Only 23.3% reported previous POCUS training. Overall, participants demonstrated a net positive attitude toward POCUS (mean score = 27.9 ± 5.4; Cronbach’s α = 0.836), though a substantial proportion (50.0%) expressed uncertainty regarding an absolute POCUS safety claim, a pattern that was independent of prior training status. A proportion of 79.6% expressed willingness to learn about POCUS, 79.4% agreed that POCUS supports standard assessment and 78.8% agreed that POCUS provides additional information for decision-making. The three main reported motivators were training availability (83.1%), direct supervision during use (81.8%) and institutional support (79.4%). The three main barriers were lack of time (76.7%), unavailability of training programs (74.2%) and lack of POCUS experts (73.4%). Participants with prior POCUS training had significantly higher attitude scores (<i>p</i> = .001).</p> Conclusion <p>EMS providers in Jordan demonstrated a net positive attitude toward POCUS as a potentially useful adjunct to prehospital care, though a substantial proportion expressed safety-related uncertainty, consistent with the absence of routine operational exposure to the technology. Adoption of POCUS remains constrained by structural and training-related barriers. These findings reflect perceived value rather than demonstrated clinical effectiveness. Addressing gaps in training, supervision, competency-based credentialing and imaging governance may support future integration, but further research is required to evaluate clinical and operational outcomes.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Point-of-care ultrasound in prehospital emergency care: attitudes, facilitators and barriers

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年5月26日

查看全文
  • Alaa O. Oteir,
  • Maram Alakhras,
  • Zainab Alqudah,
  • Maryam Yagbeh,
  • Rasha Buhumaid,
  • Liqaa Rafee,
  • Brett Williams

摘要

Objective

This study aimed to explore Emergency Medical Services (EMS) providers’ perceptions of prehospital Point-of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS), including perceived usefulness, facilitators, and barriers to its implementing in Jordanian prehospital settings.

Methods

A multicenter cross-sectional study was conducted among EMS providers using a structured questionnaire. Attitudes were measured using a four-point Likert scale, while facilitators and barriers were assessed with dichotomous (yes/no) responses. A total attitude score was calculated by summing Likert-scale responses. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize responses and inferential analyses (independent-samples t-tests and ANOVA) were conducted to examine group differences. Internal consistency was evaluated using Cronbach’s alpha and Kuder–Richardson Formula 20 (KR-20).

Results

A total of 621 participants were included in the study. The majority were males (78.3%), with a mean age of 29.5 ± 4.4 years and EMS experience of 9.7 ± 4.6 years. Only 23.3% reported previous POCUS training. Overall, participants demonstrated a net positive attitude toward POCUS (mean score = 27.9 ± 5.4; Cronbach’s α = 0.836), though a substantial proportion (50.0%) expressed uncertainty regarding an absolute POCUS safety claim, a pattern that was independent of prior training status. A proportion of 79.6% expressed willingness to learn about POCUS, 79.4% agreed that POCUS supports standard assessment and 78.8% agreed that POCUS provides additional information for decision-making. The three main reported motivators were training availability (83.1%), direct supervision during use (81.8%) and institutional support (79.4%). The three main barriers were lack of time (76.7%), unavailability of training programs (74.2%) and lack of POCUS experts (73.4%). Participants with prior POCUS training had significantly higher attitude scores (p = .001).

Conclusion

EMS providers in Jordan demonstrated a net positive attitude toward POCUS as a potentially useful adjunct to prehospital care, though a substantial proportion expressed safety-related uncertainty, consistent with the absence of routine operational exposure to the technology. Adoption of POCUS remains constrained by structural and training-related barriers. These findings reflect perceived value rather than demonstrated clinical effectiveness. Addressing gaps in training, supervision, competency-based credentialing and imaging governance may support future integration, but further research is required to evaluate clinical and operational outcomes.