Background <p>Occupational stress is a persistent challenge for university faculty, with important implications for well-being and professional performance. This study examined rank-related differences in perceived stress and identified key sources of stress among university faculty.</p> Methods <p>A cross-sectional survey was conducted in March 2024 among university faculty, yielding 269 valid responses. Specific stress sources were assessed using single-item indicators on a 5-point Likert scale, and perceived stress was measured using the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) and categorized into low, moderate, and high stress. Multivariable regression analyses were performed to examine associations between stress sources, academic rank, and perceived stress.</p> Results <p>Professors reported the lowest perceived stress levels (mean [SD]: 21.2 [4.6]), whereas lecturers reported the highest levels (24.9 [6.1]), with significant differences across academic ranks (<i>p</i> = 0.001). After adjustment for other stress sources, academic performance-related stress was independently associated with higher academic rank, with increased relative risk ratios among professors (RRR = 2.63, 95% CI: 1.36–5.05), associate professors (RRR = 3.07, 95% CI: 1.95–4.84), and lecturers (RRR = 2.55, 95% CI: 1.67–3.89), compared with teaching assistants.</p> <p>Among faculty with high perceived stress, interpersonal relationship stress (coefficient = 0.78, <i>p</i> = 0.014) and academic performance stress (coefficient = 0.66, <i>p</i> = 0.011) were significantly associated with higher PSS scores.</p> Conclusions <p>Perceived stress levels and dominant stressors varied substantially across academic ranks. Academic performance and interpersonal relationship stress emerged as key contributors to high stress. Targeted institutional support, such as structured mentoring for early-career faculty and stress management initiatives, may help mitigate rank-specific stress and promote faculty well-being.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Academic rank and stress among university faculty in a medical university in Yunnan, China

  • Ying Chen,
  • Zhen Wan,
  • Siyan Zhou,
  • Huajun Tang,
  • Hongyu Gong

摘要

Background

Occupational stress is a persistent challenge for university faculty, with important implications for well-being and professional performance. This study examined rank-related differences in perceived stress and identified key sources of stress among university faculty.

Methods

A cross-sectional survey was conducted in March 2024 among university faculty, yielding 269 valid responses. Specific stress sources were assessed using single-item indicators on a 5-point Likert scale, and perceived stress was measured using the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) and categorized into low, moderate, and high stress. Multivariable regression analyses were performed to examine associations between stress sources, academic rank, and perceived stress.

Results

Professors reported the lowest perceived stress levels (mean [SD]: 21.2 [4.6]), whereas lecturers reported the highest levels (24.9 [6.1]), with significant differences across academic ranks (p = 0.001). After adjustment for other stress sources, academic performance-related stress was independently associated with higher academic rank, with increased relative risk ratios among professors (RRR = 2.63, 95% CI: 1.36–5.05), associate professors (RRR = 3.07, 95% CI: 1.95–4.84), and lecturers (RRR = 2.55, 95% CI: 1.67–3.89), compared with teaching assistants.

Among faculty with high perceived stress, interpersonal relationship stress (coefficient = 0.78, p = 0.014) and academic performance stress (coefficient = 0.66, p = 0.011) were significantly associated with higher PSS scores.

Conclusions

Perceived stress levels and dominant stressors varied substantially across academic ranks. Academic performance and interpersonal relationship stress emerged as key contributors to high stress. Targeted institutional support, such as structured mentoring for early-career faculty and stress management initiatives, may help mitigate rank-specific stress and promote faculty well-being.