Scholarlink

<p>This mixed-methods survey of 115 fifth- and sixth-year medical students at the Medical University of Innsbruck evaluated perceptions of teaching formats in Internal Medicine. Digital platforms (Amboss<sup>®</sup>, Anki<sup>®</sup>) were clearly preferred over traditional textbooks. Hematology/oncology (29.6%) and nephrology/hypertension (26.1%) were viewed as most challenging subjects. Students advocated for case-based learning, small-group discussions and improved hands-on clinical engagement. Variability in practical experiences underscores the need for standardized, interactive curricula. Integrating digital, on-demand resources with structured clinical activities may enhance engagement, knowledge retention, and preparedness for clinical practice.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Evaluation of internal medicine education: insights from a student survey

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年3月19日

查看全文
  • Clemens Untersulzner,
  • Hannes Neuwirt,
  • Sebastian J. Reinstadler,
  • Andreas Kronbichler

摘要

This mixed-methods survey of 115 fifth- and sixth-year medical students at the Medical University of Innsbruck evaluated perceptions of teaching formats in Internal Medicine. Digital platforms (Amboss®, Anki®) were clearly preferred over traditional textbooks. Hematology/oncology (29.6%) and nephrology/hypertension (26.1%) were viewed as most challenging subjects. Students advocated for case-based learning, small-group discussions and improved hands-on clinical engagement. Variability in practical experiences underscores the need for standardized, interactive curricula. Integrating digital, on-demand resources with structured clinical activities may enhance engagement, knowledge retention, and preparedness for clinical practice.