Scholarlink

Background <p>Egypt’s recent shift to an integrated (5+2) medical curriculum aims to enhance clinical competence but may also intensify stress among students. Understanding stressors and coping mechanisms is critical for promoting student well-being. This study aims to assess the levels and domains of stress, identify their predictors, and evaluate coping strategies among undergraduate medical students in Egypt.</p> Methods <p>A multicenter cross-sectional study was conducted among 984 undergraduate medical students from Egyptian universities between April and May 2024 with response rate of 98.4%. Data were collected via a structured online questionnaire including demographics, the validated Medical Student Stressor Questionnaire (MSSQ), and the Coping Scale. Stressor domains were scored on a 0–4 Likert scale and coping on a 1–4 scale. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses identified predictors of stress and coping levels.Results:Academic-Related Stressors (ARS) recorded the highest mean score (2.97 ± 0.81), with “lack of time to review” and “large content load” as top stressors. Drive and Desire-Related Stressors (DRS) scored lowest (1.80 ± 1.18). High to severe stress prevalence was greatest in Academic Related Stress (ARS, 82.6%), followed by Group Activities-Related Stressors (GARS, 57.2%) and Interpersonal/Intrapersonal-Related Stressors (IRS, 54.7%). Female students showed significantly higher odds of stress in ARS, TLRS, SRS, DRS, and GARS and had lower coping scores (β = –0.21, p = 0.025). Rural residence increased odds of IRS (AOR = 1.67, p =0.047). Monthly income between 5,000 and 10,000 L.E. was associated with lower coping scores (β = –0.93, p = 0.040). Upcoming exams amplified stress across GARS,and TLRS. Chronic illness was linked to higher SRS (AOR = 1.81, p = 0.01). Overall, students relied more on emotion-focused and avoidance coping, while problem-focused strategies were less frequently employed.</p> Conclusion <p>Egyptian medical students face substantial stress, predominantly academic in nature, under the integrated curriculum. Targeted institutional strategies—such as workload adjustments, clear academic expectations, anti-abuse measures, and resilience training—are needed to foster a healthier learning environment.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Stressors and coping strategies among Egyptian medical students under the integrated curriculum: a multicenter cross-sectional study

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年1月16日

查看全文
  • Mahmoud Abd El-Nasser,
  • Aya Elsayed Abdelwahed,
  • Nour Edin Darwish,
  • Mohamed Rabiea Abdelnaby Fathallah Hamad,
  • Aya Muhammed Ali Suleiman,
  • Khloud Ahmed Saad Elsayed,
  • Rahma AbdElfattah Ibrahim,
  • Marwa M.I. Ghallab,
  • Ahmed F. Elbialy,
  • Rafik F. Khalil,
  • Mahmoud A. Said,
  • Mariam Ashraf,
  • Alaa A. Seleem,
  • Sara A. Naeim,
  • Mostafa Nemr,
  • Rana A. Heigab,
  • Ibrahim Ragheb,
  • Mahmoud N. Mahmoud

摘要

Background

Egypt’s recent shift to an integrated (5+2) medical curriculum aims to enhance clinical competence but may also intensify stress among students. Understanding stressors and coping mechanisms is critical for promoting student well-being. This study aims to assess the levels and domains of stress, identify their predictors, and evaluate coping strategies among undergraduate medical students in Egypt.

Methods

A multicenter cross-sectional study was conducted among 984 undergraduate medical students from Egyptian universities between April and May 2024 with response rate of 98.4%. Data were collected via a structured online questionnaire including demographics, the validated Medical Student Stressor Questionnaire (MSSQ), and the Coping Scale. Stressor domains were scored on a 0–4 Likert scale and coping on a 1–4 scale. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses identified predictors of stress and coping levels.Results:Academic-Related Stressors (ARS) recorded the highest mean score (2.97 ± 0.81), with “lack of time to review” and “large content load” as top stressors. Drive and Desire-Related Stressors (DRS) scored lowest (1.80 ± 1.18). High to severe stress prevalence was greatest in Academic Related Stress (ARS, 82.6%), followed by Group Activities-Related Stressors (GARS, 57.2%) and Interpersonal/Intrapersonal-Related Stressors (IRS, 54.7%). Female students showed significantly higher odds of stress in ARS, TLRS, SRS, DRS, and GARS and had lower coping scores (β = –0.21, p = 0.025). Rural residence increased odds of IRS (AOR = 1.67, p =0.047). Monthly income between 5,000 and 10,000 L.E. was associated with lower coping scores (β = –0.93, p = 0.040). Upcoming exams amplified stress across GARS,and TLRS. Chronic illness was linked to higher SRS (AOR = 1.81, p = 0.01). Overall, students relied more on emotion-focused and avoidance coping, while problem-focused strategies were less frequently employed.

Conclusion

Egyptian medical students face substantial stress, predominantly academic in nature, under the integrated curriculum. Targeted institutional strategies—such as workload adjustments, clear academic expectations, anti-abuse measures, and resilience training—are needed to foster a healthier learning environment.