Objective <p>To investigate the efficacy of situational simulation teaching (SST) in enhancing clinical thinking competencies among residents.</p> Methods <p>A randomized controlled trial was conducted with second-year residents (<i>n</i> = 121) during their rotation (May-August 2025). Participants were allocated to either an intervention group (<i>n</i> = 57, receiving SST) or a control group (<i>n</i> = 64, conventional training). Pre- and post-intervention assessments evaluated clinical thinking performance. Faculty assessments using the entrust able professional activities (EPAs) and Mini-clinical evaluation exercise (Mini-CEX) were completed within 2 weeks post-training, supplemented by resident satisfaction surveys.</p> Results <p>Both groups demonstrated significant post-intervention improvement in overall clinical thinking scores (all <i>P</i> &lt; 0.05), except for the “Ethics and Professionalism” domain in controls (<i>P</i> = 0.12).The intervention group outperformed the control group in total clinical thinking scores and all sub-dimensions (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.05), with higher EPAs scores, EPA pass rates, and Mini-CEX total scores (all <i>P</i> &lt; 0.05). Resident satisfaction (content, resources, interaction, and teaching methods) was also significantly higher in the intervention group (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.05).</p> Conclusion <p>SST significantly enhances clinical thinking development in residency programs.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Situational simulation teaching can effectively enhance the clinical thinking ability of residents

  • Jing Meng,
  • Li Wang,
  • Danni Jin,
  • Zihan Li,
  • Qingqing Tao,
  • Lan Ying

摘要

Objective

To investigate the efficacy of situational simulation teaching (SST) in enhancing clinical thinking competencies among residents.

Methods

A randomized controlled trial was conducted with second-year residents (n = 121) during their rotation (May-August 2025). Participants were allocated to either an intervention group (n = 57, receiving SST) or a control group (n = 64, conventional training). Pre- and post-intervention assessments evaluated clinical thinking performance. Faculty assessments using the entrust able professional activities (EPAs) and Mini-clinical evaluation exercise (Mini-CEX) were completed within 2 weeks post-training, supplemented by resident satisfaction surveys.

Results

Both groups demonstrated significant post-intervention improvement in overall clinical thinking scores (all P < 0.05), except for the “Ethics and Professionalism” domain in controls (P = 0.12).The intervention group outperformed the control group in total clinical thinking scores and all sub-dimensions (P < 0.05), with higher EPAs scores, EPA pass rates, and Mini-CEX total scores (all P < 0.05). Resident satisfaction (content, resources, interaction, and teaching methods) was also significantly higher in the intervention group (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

SST significantly enhances clinical thinking development in residency programs.