Scholarlink

Background <p>Evaluation tools for training programs vary, necessitating a standardized tool for assessing surgical clinical training quality to enhance program effectiveness, pinpoint improvement areas, and ensure resident readiness for independent practice. We present a new tool designed to provide a reliable and consistent framework for evaluating the effectiveness of surgical clinical training.</p> Methods <p>The Surgical Clinical Training Measurement (SCTM) was developed using the modified Delphi method to evaluate ten variables, including core competencies specific to surgical training. It employs a 5-point Likert scale, with scores ranging from 40 to 200. General surgery residents completed the SCTM twice to evaluate training levels. Results were categorized based on score ranges. Statistical analysis via SPSS included descriptive statistics, group comparisons, internal consistency assessments, correlations, and reliability tests to evaluate the SCTM scores, demographic characteristics, and language versions. ANOVA, Chi-Square, Cohen Kappa, and Spearman’s rho tests were employed for data analysis.</p> Results <p>74 general surgery residents at Aleppo University Hospital have participated in this study. The SCTM scores indicated a mean total score of 131.42, with most residents falling into the good satisfactory category. Analysis showed no significant differences in total scores across specialty years, but post-hoc tests revealed differences between specific years. The SCTM demonstrated strong reliability, with a Kappa value of 0.884 indicating high agreement between English and Arabic versions (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). Test-retest reliability was also high (<i>r</i> = 0.964, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01). Internal consistency was excellent across various domains, reinforcing its validity in surgical education. The analysis of variables showed different levels of reliability and mean scores among the various factors. The Pre-Operative Clinical variable had the highest performance, while the Evidence-Based Quality Clinical Training variable indicated the most potential for improvement. The strong positive correlations between various domains of SCTM emphasize the interconnected nature of skill development, with proficiency in patient care closely linked to competency in other areas such as Medical Knowledge, Practice-based Learning and Improvement, and Evidence-Based Quality Clinical Training.</p> Conclusion <p>SCTM offers a standardized and cohesive method for evaluating the quality of surgical clinical training. It’s a valuable resource for program directors, educators, and residents to assess and enhance training programs, and identify specific areas for improvement. Additional research is required to validate the SCTM in different settings and explore its applicability in other fields.</p> Clinical trial number <p>Not applicable.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

The surgical clinical training measurement: developing and evaluating the quality of surgical clinical training among Syrian surgical residents

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年3月30日

查看全文
  • Ahmad Ghazal,
  • Mayssoon Dashash

摘要

Background

Evaluation tools for training programs vary, necessitating a standardized tool for assessing surgical clinical training quality to enhance program effectiveness, pinpoint improvement areas, and ensure resident readiness for independent practice. We present a new tool designed to provide a reliable and consistent framework for evaluating the effectiveness of surgical clinical training.

Methods

The Surgical Clinical Training Measurement (SCTM) was developed using the modified Delphi method to evaluate ten variables, including core competencies specific to surgical training. It employs a 5-point Likert scale, with scores ranging from 40 to 200. General surgery residents completed the SCTM twice to evaluate training levels. Results were categorized based on score ranges. Statistical analysis via SPSS included descriptive statistics, group comparisons, internal consistency assessments, correlations, and reliability tests to evaluate the SCTM scores, demographic characteristics, and language versions. ANOVA, Chi-Square, Cohen Kappa, and Spearman’s rho tests were employed for data analysis.

Results

74 general surgery residents at Aleppo University Hospital have participated in this study. The SCTM scores indicated a mean total score of 131.42, with most residents falling into the good satisfactory category. Analysis showed no significant differences in total scores across specialty years, but post-hoc tests revealed differences between specific years. The SCTM demonstrated strong reliability, with a Kappa value of 0.884 indicating high agreement between English and Arabic versions (p < 0.05). Test-retest reliability was also high (r = 0.964, p < 0.01). Internal consistency was excellent across various domains, reinforcing its validity in surgical education. The analysis of variables showed different levels of reliability and mean scores among the various factors. The Pre-Operative Clinical variable had the highest performance, while the Evidence-Based Quality Clinical Training variable indicated the most potential for improvement. The strong positive correlations between various domains of SCTM emphasize the interconnected nature of skill development, with proficiency in patient care closely linked to competency in other areas such as Medical Knowledge, Practice-based Learning and Improvement, and Evidence-Based Quality Clinical Training.

Conclusion

SCTM offers a standardized and cohesive method for evaluating the quality of surgical clinical training. It’s a valuable resource for program directors, educators, and residents to assess and enhance training programs, and identify specific areas for improvement. Additional research is required to validate the SCTM in different settings and explore its applicability in other fields.

Clinical trial number

Not applicable.