Scholarlink

Introduction <p>Access to menstrual products is a key factor for improving menstrual health, but there is limited research on the facilitators and barriers to their uptake and use. We describe menstrual product use, and factors associated with use of freely-distributed reusable pads and menstrual cups among female students in Ugandan secondary schools.</p> Methods <p>We analysed one-year follow-up data nested within a cluster-randomised trial evaluating the effectiveness of a multi-component menstrual health intervention among female students in 60 schools. The intervention included provision of five reusable pads and an optional menstrual cup, with training. We used random-effects logistic regression to identify factors associated with reported use of each product type at last menstrual period (LMP) at endline. We conducted focus group discussions and in-depth interviews among students and caregivers to explore product preferences, using thematic analysis.</p> Results <p>We analysed data from 2622 post-menarche participants present at both baseline and endline (mean age 15.6 years). Of these, 1683 (64.2%) used more than one type of menstrual product at LMP and 2203 (84.0%) used disposable pads at LMP, at endline. Among 1221/1302 (93.8%) intervention arm participants who received menstrual pads, and 613 (47.1%) who received a menstrual cup, 845 (69.2%) and 156 (25.4%) respectively reported using these products at LMP at endline. Reusable pad use was associated with older age, lower socioeconomic status, being a day scholar, prior use of reusable pads, and having higher menstrual self-efficacy at baseline. Use of a menstrual cup was associated with older age and being of non-Muganda ethnicity. Qualitative findings showed that knowledge, perceptions, affordability, prior familiarity, ease of use, comfort, peer influence, social stigma, and access to private washing facilities played key roles in product preference among the students.</p> Conclusion <p>In this setting, participants used more than one product during a single menstrual period and preferred disposable pads when provided with free reusable products, due to challenges including washing and drying, social stigma, and discomfort. Provision of menstrual products needs to address both uptake and sustained use by considering individual preferences, cultural acceptability, sustainability, comfort, and environmental factors.</p> Trial registration <p>ISRCTN 45461276; 16/09/2021.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Menstrual product preference and factors associated with use of freely-distributed reusable products among secondary students in Uganda: a longitudinal study

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年5月21日

查看全文
  • Levicatus Mugenyi,
  • Ronald Kyasanku,
  • Robert Bakanoma,
  • Denis Ndekezi,
  • Kate Andrews Nelson,
  • Katherine A Thomas,
  • Stephen Lagony,
  • Aggrey Tumuhimbise,
  • Jackline Namara,
  • Norah Kembabazi,
  • Andrew Mpaji,
  • Shamirah Nakalema,
  • Clare Tanton,
  • Mandikudza Tembo,
  • Nambusi Kyegombe,
  • Helen A Weiss,
  • Belen Torondel-Lopez

摘要

Introduction

Access to menstrual products is a key factor for improving menstrual health, but there is limited research on the facilitators and barriers to their uptake and use. We describe menstrual product use, and factors associated with use of freely-distributed reusable pads and menstrual cups among female students in Ugandan secondary schools.

Methods

We analysed one-year follow-up data nested within a cluster-randomised trial evaluating the effectiveness of a multi-component menstrual health intervention among female students in 60 schools. The intervention included provision of five reusable pads and an optional menstrual cup, with training. We used random-effects logistic regression to identify factors associated with reported use of each product type at last menstrual period (LMP) at endline. We conducted focus group discussions and in-depth interviews among students and caregivers to explore product preferences, using thematic analysis.

Results

We analysed data from 2622 post-menarche participants present at both baseline and endline (mean age 15.6 years). Of these, 1683 (64.2%) used more than one type of menstrual product at LMP and 2203 (84.0%) used disposable pads at LMP, at endline. Among 1221/1302 (93.8%) intervention arm participants who received menstrual pads, and 613 (47.1%) who received a menstrual cup, 845 (69.2%) and 156 (25.4%) respectively reported using these products at LMP at endline. Reusable pad use was associated with older age, lower socioeconomic status, being a day scholar, prior use of reusable pads, and having higher menstrual self-efficacy at baseline. Use of a menstrual cup was associated with older age and being of non-Muganda ethnicity. Qualitative findings showed that knowledge, perceptions, affordability, prior familiarity, ease of use, comfort, peer influence, social stigma, and access to private washing facilities played key roles in product preference among the students.

Conclusion

In this setting, participants used more than one product during a single menstrual period and preferred disposable pads when provided with free reusable products, due to challenges including washing and drying, social stigma, and discomfort. Provision of menstrual products needs to address both uptake and sustained use by considering individual preferences, cultural acceptability, sustainability, comfort, and environmental factors.

Trial registration

ISRCTN 45461276; 16/09/2021.