Background <p>Expectations determine treatment outcomes in several medical conditions. The significance of expectations for treatment outcomes in patients with endometriosis remains unknown. Endometriosis is a painful and debilitating disease that negatively affects quality of life. Up to 30% of surgically treated patients report persistent post-operative complaints and pain disability without sufficient medical explanation, indicating the impact of non-medical factors on treatment outcomes.</p> Aim <p>The present qualitative study aimed to describe and understand pre-operative patient expectations, facilitators of and barriers to positive treatment outcomes.</p> Method <p>As part of a large mixed-method cohort study, a subsample of <i>N</i> = 33 patients with endometriosis were interviewed before laparoscopy. Structured content analysis was performed.</p> Results <p>Positive expectations included significant improvement or absence of complaints, receiving a diagnosis, and subsequently improved health-related quality of life. However, patients also reported negative expectations such as invalidation of their experience, persistence of complaints, or post-operative side effects. Patients perceived positive expectations as facilitators for positive treatment outcomes. Further facilitators included enhanced patient and treatment information, gynaecologists specialized in endometriosis, and greater awareness of endometriosis. Perceived barriers to good post-operative quality of life included post-operative pain and scarring, insufficient rest, avoidance behaviour, and stress.</p> Conclusion <p>Positive and negative expectations coexisted. Positive expectations suggest that participants place much hope in laparoscopy. However, these positive expectations may exceed probable treatment outcomes for some patients. Negative expectations were also expressed and constituted a risk for nocebo effects. Further identified facilitators and barriers show that patients are very clear about what is helpful or not for their health-related quality of life after laparoscopy. Patient and treatment information may be enhanced to prevent unrealistic treatment expectations and nocebo effects.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Pre-operative expectations in patients with endometriosis – a qualitative interview study

  • Nina Hirsing,
  • Yvonne Nestoriuc,
  • Olaf Buchweitz,
  • Ann-Katrin Meyrose

摘要

Background

Expectations determine treatment outcomes in several medical conditions. The significance of expectations for treatment outcomes in patients with endometriosis remains unknown. Endometriosis is a painful and debilitating disease that negatively affects quality of life. Up to 30% of surgically treated patients report persistent post-operative complaints and pain disability without sufficient medical explanation, indicating the impact of non-medical factors on treatment outcomes.

Aim

The present qualitative study aimed to describe and understand pre-operative patient expectations, facilitators of and barriers to positive treatment outcomes.

Method

As part of a large mixed-method cohort study, a subsample of N = 33 patients with endometriosis were interviewed before laparoscopy. Structured content analysis was performed.

Results

Positive expectations included significant improvement or absence of complaints, receiving a diagnosis, and subsequently improved health-related quality of life. However, patients also reported negative expectations such as invalidation of their experience, persistence of complaints, or post-operative side effects. Patients perceived positive expectations as facilitators for positive treatment outcomes. Further facilitators included enhanced patient and treatment information, gynaecologists specialized in endometriosis, and greater awareness of endometriosis. Perceived barriers to good post-operative quality of life included post-operative pain and scarring, insufficient rest, avoidance behaviour, and stress.

Conclusion

Positive and negative expectations coexisted. Positive expectations suggest that participants place much hope in laparoscopy. However, these positive expectations may exceed probable treatment outcomes for some patients. Negative expectations were also expressed and constituted a risk for nocebo effects. Further identified facilitators and barriers show that patients are very clear about what is helpful or not for their health-related quality of life after laparoscopy. Patient and treatment information may be enhanced to prevent unrealistic treatment expectations and nocebo effects.