Scholarlink

Background <p>Social homecare workers (personal aides/assistants) are crucial for people wishing to receive end-of-life care at home.</p> Aim <p>To determine current UK social care policy priorities and gaps regarding end-of-life care provision by homecare workers, including support and training for this workforce.</p> Design <p>Policy document review and content analysis; eligible documents were current UK policy documents informing homecare worker practice/service delivery, identified by team expertise, networks, study partners and bibliography review of included documents. We quantified (existence, frequency) predetermined codes of interest in relation to end-of-life/palliative/care of the dying/bereavement, homecare workforce, and support and training.</p> <p>Where homecare worker codes were contextually situated, we extracted and tabulated the surrounding text and examined for reference to training and support. We subjected extracted text content to framework analysis through the lens of Bronfenbrenner’s Adapted Ecological Systems Theory.</p> Results <p>One thousand, four hundred and sixty-four homecare worker codes were identified in the 36 included documents, but only 72 times/17 documents in the context of end-of-life care. In the context of end-of-life care and homecare workers, education and training codes were present 3 and 35 times respectively. The need for end-of-life education and training was recognised, but in general, little detail about delivery and implementation was given (e.g., whose responsibility; funding; minimum standard and content).</p> Conclusions <p>The homecare worker role in end-of-life care is poorly recognised in national policy. Little guidance is provided regarding minimum training standards or delivery. Given an ageing population globally and expected increased demand for end-of-life homecare, national and international policy guidance should include this workforce.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Policy gaps regarding social homecare in the context of end-of-life; a policy document analysis

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年5月27日

查看全文
  • Helene Louise Elliott-Button,
  • Kasonde Mwaba,
  • Zana Bayley,
  • Joan Bothma,
  • Cat Forward,
  • Jamilla Hussain,
  • Justine Krygier,
  • Mark Pearson,
  • Paul Taylor,
  • Caroline White,
  • Jane Wray,
  • Liz Walker,
  • Miriam Johnson

摘要

Background

Social homecare workers (personal aides/assistants) are crucial for people wishing to receive end-of-life care at home.

Aim

To determine current UK social care policy priorities and gaps regarding end-of-life care provision by homecare workers, including support and training for this workforce.

Design

Policy document review and content analysis; eligible documents were current UK policy documents informing homecare worker practice/service delivery, identified by team expertise, networks, study partners and bibliography review of included documents. We quantified (existence, frequency) predetermined codes of interest in relation to end-of-life/palliative/care of the dying/bereavement, homecare workforce, and support and training.

Where homecare worker codes were contextually situated, we extracted and tabulated the surrounding text and examined for reference to training and support. We subjected extracted text content to framework analysis through the lens of Bronfenbrenner’s Adapted Ecological Systems Theory.

Results

One thousand, four hundred and sixty-four homecare worker codes were identified in the 36 included documents, but only 72 times/17 documents in the context of end-of-life care. In the context of end-of-life care and homecare workers, education and training codes were present 3 and 35 times respectively. The need for end-of-life education and training was recognised, but in general, little detail about delivery and implementation was given (e.g., whose responsibility; funding; minimum standard and content).

Conclusions

The homecare worker role in end-of-life care is poorly recognised in national policy. Little guidance is provided regarding minimum training standards or delivery. Given an ageing population globally and expected increased demand for end-of-life homecare, national and international policy guidance should include this workforce.