Background Preservation of cortical bone during surgical management of maxillofacial cysts may enhance early bone regeneration and functional recovery. This study aimed to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of the Bone Lid Technique versus standard curettage. Methods In this single-center randomized controlled trial, 60 patients with maxillofacial cysts ≥ 3 × 3 × 3 mm were assigned to the Bone Lid group <InlineEquation ID="IEq1"><EquationSource Format="TEX">\(n=30\)</EquationSource></InlineEquation> or standard curettage group <InlineEquation ID="IEq2"><EquationSource Format="TEX">\(n=30\)</EquationSource></InlineEquation>. CBCT-based three-dimensional analyses assessed defect volume, surface area, and grayscale value. Periodontal outcomes (probing depth [PD], clinical attachment level [CAL]) and tooth mobility were evaluated at baseline, 3, 6, and 9 months. Percentage changes between consecutive visits were analyzed using linear mixed-effects models, while longitudinal tooth mobility was analyzed using ordinal logistic mixed-effects models. Baseline lesion size was additionally evaluated as a potential confounding factor. A lesion-size sensitivity analysis was performed after excluding lesions in the lowest quartile of the pooled baseline defect-volume distribution. Binary logistic regression was additionally used to assess tooth stability at 9 months. Results Compared with the standard curettage group, the Bone Lid group showed significantly greater reductions in defect surface area (β = 13.782, 95% CI 5.924–21.640, P = 0.001) and volume (β = 22.436, 95% CI 14.285–30.587, P < 0.001), and greater increase in grayscale values (β = − 4.615, 95% CI − 8.292 to − 0.938, P = 0.014). PD and CAL improved more favorably in the Bone Lid group (β = 22.548 and 53.913, both P < 0.001). Tooth mobility decreased progressively in both groups, but recovery was faster and more stable in the Bone Lid group. Binary logistic regression confirmed a higher probability of achieving stable teeth at 9 months in the Bone Lid group (OR = 4.42, 95% CI 1.15–17.03, P = 0.031). Conclusion The Bone Lid Technique was associated with more favorable early bone regeneration and enhanced tooth stability compared with standard curettage. However, the robustness of the surface-area finding should be interpreted cautiously because baseline lesion morphology differed between groups and the corresponding sensitivity estimate was less stable. It may be particularly beneficial for moderate-sized cystic defects, lesions involving multiple adjacent teeth, or cases where preservation of cortical bone and early functional recovery are priorities. Trial registration This clinical trial was registered at chictr.org.cn on June 16, 2025 and had registration number ChiCTR2500104364.Retrospectively registered.

Bone lid technique versus standard curettage for maxillofacial cysts: a prospective 3D CBCT study of bone regeneration and tooth stability

期刊论文
出版模式：

开放获取
发表日期：

2026年7月25日

查看全文

Beibei Zhang,
Ruixiang Li,
Tingyi Gao,
Shengkai Liao,
Kai Zhang,
Yongfeng Chen

摘要

Background

Preservation of cortical bone during surgical management of maxillofacial cysts may enhance early bone regeneration and functional recovery. This study aimed to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of the Bone Lid Technique versus standard curettage.

Methods

In this single-center randomized controlled trial, 60 patients with maxillofacial cysts ≥ 3 × 3 × 3 mm were assigned to the Bone Lid group \(n=30\) or standard curettage group \(n=30\). CBCT-based three-dimensional analyses assessed defect volume, surface area, and grayscale value. Periodontal outcomes (probing depth [PD], clinical attachment level [CAL]) and tooth mobility were evaluated at baseline, 3, 6, and 9 months. Percentage changes between consecutive visits were analyzed using linear mixed-effects models, while longitudinal tooth mobility was analyzed using ordinal logistic mixed-effects models. Baseline lesion size was additionally evaluated as a potential confounding factor. A lesion-size sensitivity analysis was performed after excluding lesions in the lowest quartile of the pooled baseline defect-volume distribution. Binary logistic regression was additionally used to assess tooth stability at 9 months.

Results

Compared with the standard curettage group, the Bone Lid group showed significantly greater reductions in defect surface area (β = 13.782, 95% CI 5.924–21.640, P = 0.001) and volume (β = 22.436, 95% CI 14.285–30.587, P < 0.001), and greater increase in grayscale values (β = − 4.615, 95% CI − 8.292 to − 0.938, P = 0.014). PD and CAL improved more favorably in the Bone Lid group (β = 22.548 and 53.913, both P < 0.001). Tooth mobility decreased progressively in both groups, but recovery was faster and more stable in the Bone Lid group. Binary logistic regression confirmed a higher probability of achieving stable teeth at 9 months in the Bone Lid group (OR = 4.42, 95% CI 1.15–17.03, P = 0.031).

Conclusion

The Bone Lid Technique was associated with more favorable early bone regeneration and enhanced tooth stability compared with standard curettage. However, the robustness of the surface-area finding should be interpreted cautiously because baseline lesion morphology differed between groups and the corresponding sensitivity estimate was less stable. It may be particularly beneficial for moderate-sized cystic defects, lesions involving multiple adjacent teeth, or cases where preservation of cortical bone and early functional recovery are priorities.

Trial registration

This clinical trial was registered at chictr.org.cn on June 16, 2025 and had registration number ChiCTR2500104364.Retrospectively registered.