Background <p>This study aimed to evaluate the effects of ceramic composition, resin cement shade, and tooth-shaded background on the optical properties and color differences of high translucent (HT) lithium-based ceramics.</p> Methods <p>A total of 192 specimens were prepared from four CAD/CAM ceramics: advanced lithium disilicate, lithium disilicate, and two zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate ceramics. The relative translucency parameter (RTP) and opalescence (OP) were evaluated using a digital spectrophotometer. Specimens were evaluated using two resin cement shades (opaque and translucent) and two tooth-shaded backgrounds (A1 and A3). Color differences (ΔE₀₀) between baseline and after cementation measurements were calculated using the CIEDE2000 formula. Data were analyzed using one-way and three-way ANOVA (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05).</p> Results <p>Ceramic material significantly influenced RTP and OP values (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). Three-way ANOVA revealed significant main effects of material and cement shade (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), as well as a significant material × tooth-shaded background interaction (<i>p</i> = 0.013). Opaque cement resulted in significantly higher color differences than translucent cement across all materials and backgrounds (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). Higher ΔE₀₀ values were found on the A3 background.</p> Conclusions <p>The final color and optical properties of HT lithium-based ceramics were influenced by ceramic composition and resin cement shade. These findings may help clinicians optimize cement shade and material selection for improved esthetic outcomes.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Effect of resin cement shade and tooth-shaded background on the final color and optical properties of high-translucency lithium-based CAD/CAM ceramics

  • Merve Ünal,
  • Aysıla Tekeli Şimşek,
  • Berkay Enes Güngör,
  • Bengisu Yıldırım

摘要

Background

This study aimed to evaluate the effects of ceramic composition, resin cement shade, and tooth-shaded background on the optical properties and color differences of high translucent (HT) lithium-based ceramics.

Methods

A total of 192 specimens were prepared from four CAD/CAM ceramics: advanced lithium disilicate, lithium disilicate, and two zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate ceramics. The relative translucency parameter (RTP) and opalescence (OP) were evaluated using a digital spectrophotometer. Specimens were evaluated using two resin cement shades (opaque and translucent) and two tooth-shaded backgrounds (A1 and A3). Color differences (ΔE₀₀) between baseline and after cementation measurements were calculated using the CIEDE2000 formula. Data were analyzed using one-way and three-way ANOVA (p < 0.05).

Results

Ceramic material significantly influenced RTP and OP values (p < 0.05). Three-way ANOVA revealed significant main effects of material and cement shade (p < 0.001), as well as a significant material × tooth-shaded background interaction (p = 0.013). Opaque cement resulted in significantly higher color differences than translucent cement across all materials and backgrounds (p < 0.05). Higher ΔE₀₀ values were found on the A3 background.

Conclusions

The final color and optical properties of HT lithium-based ceramics were influenced by ceramic composition and resin cement shade. These findings may help clinicians optimize cement shade and material selection for improved esthetic outcomes.