Purpose <p>To compare the survival of single-tooth implants placed in sites with previous external cervical root resorption (ECRR) to those placed in unaffected sites.</p> Methods <p>A retrospective matched cohort study was conducted using data from the Swedish National Dental Health Register (2009–2022). Patients receiving a single-tooth implant in a site with previous ECRR were identified and matched 1:1 to controls without such history by age, sex, tooth position, and timing of implant placement (± 2 years). Implant survival, defined as time from placement to removal, was analyzed using Kaplan–Meier curves and stratified Cox proportional hazards models. Restricted mean survival time (RMST) was estimated up to 10 years. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses assessed robustness.</p> Results <p>The final cohort included 605 matched pairs (<i>n =</i> 1,210). The mean age was 52 years, and 56% of implants were placed in the maxillary anterior region. Implant extraction occurred in 12/571 (2.1%) sites with previous ECRR and 21/564 (3.7%) control sites. Ten-year cumulative survival was 97.3% for sites with previous ECRR and 94.4% for controls. The difference was not statistically significant (<i>HR</i> = 0.58; 95% <i>CI</i>: 0.28–1.22; <i>p</i> = 0.15). RMST analysis showed a negligible absolute survival difference (0.11 years; 95% <i>CI</i>: −0.04 to 0.25; <i>p</i> = 0.15).</p> Conclusions <p>Within the limitations of registry-based data and a low number of failures, no statistically significant difference in implant survival was detected between sites with and without previous ECRR. These findings suggest comparable survival outcomes but should be interpreted with caution.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Survival of single-tooth implants in sites with and without history of external cervical root resorption: a register-based cohort study

  • Fernando José Mota de Almeida,
  • Jonas Norberg Cedering,
  • Mattias Pettersson

摘要

Purpose

To compare the survival of single-tooth implants placed in sites with previous external cervical root resorption (ECRR) to those placed in unaffected sites.

Methods

A retrospective matched cohort study was conducted using data from the Swedish National Dental Health Register (2009–2022). Patients receiving a single-tooth implant in a site with previous ECRR were identified and matched 1:1 to controls without such history by age, sex, tooth position, and timing of implant placement (± 2 years). Implant survival, defined as time from placement to removal, was analyzed using Kaplan–Meier curves and stratified Cox proportional hazards models. Restricted mean survival time (RMST) was estimated up to 10 years. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses assessed robustness.

Results

The final cohort included 605 matched pairs (n = 1,210). The mean age was 52 years, and 56% of implants were placed in the maxillary anterior region. Implant extraction occurred in 12/571 (2.1%) sites with previous ECRR and 21/564 (3.7%) control sites. Ten-year cumulative survival was 97.3% for sites with previous ECRR and 94.4% for controls. The difference was not statistically significant (HR = 0.58; 95% CI: 0.28–1.22; p = 0.15). RMST analysis showed a negligible absolute survival difference (0.11 years; 95% CI: −0.04 to 0.25; p = 0.15).

Conclusions

Within the limitations of registry-based data and a low number of failures, no statistically significant difference in implant survival was detected between sites with and without previous ECRR. These findings suggest comparable survival outcomes but should be interpreted with caution.