Background/objectives <p>The first clinical tooth extraction represents a pivotal and anxiety-provoking milestone in dental undergraduate education. The assessment of anxiety at this specific moment has important implications for curriculum design, student well-being, and patient safety. This study aimed to measure and characterise state and trait anxiety levels among fourth-year dental students performing tooth extraction on real patients for the first time.</p> Methods <p>A cross-sectional single-centre observational study was conducted at the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli University, Turkey. All 74 fourth-year dental students (49 female, 25 male) participating in the first compulsory clinical extraction session were invited to complete the State–Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). State anxiety (STAI-S) was assessed immediately before the extraction procedure; trait anxiety (STAI-T) was assessed during a regular, non-clinical lecture session. Descriptive statistics, a one-sample t-test, a paired-samples t-test, Pearson correlation analysis, and effect size calculations (Cohen’s d, 95% CIs) were performed.</p> Results <p>The mean STAI-S score immediately preceding the first extraction was 53.54 ± 6.17 (range 38–66), which was significantly higher than the theoretical midpoint of 50 (t = 4.937, df = 73, p &lt; 0.001, Cohen’s d = 0.574). The mean STAI-T score was 40.16 ± 6.22 (range 28–51), consistent with commonly reported normative ranges for non-clinical adult populations. State anxiety scores were significantly higher than trait anxiety scores (paired t = 21.339, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001, Cohen’s d = 2.181). A moderate positive correlation was found between state and trait anxiety (<i>r</i> = 0.621, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Most students (81.1%) showed moderate state anxiety; 17.6% showed high state anxiety. No statistically significant gender difference was found in either STAI-S or STAI-T scores (<i>p</i> = 0.441 and <i>p</i> = 0.939, respectively).</p> Conclusion <p>Fourth-year dental students experience significantly elevated situational anxiety immediately prior to their first real-patient tooth extraction, suggesting that the observed elevation was predominantly related to the situational demands of the clinical encounter. These findings support the potential value of structured psychological preparation and progressive clinical exposure in undergraduate dental curricula to optimise both student welfare and patient care outcomes.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Anxiety levels during the first clinical tooth extraction experience among fourth-year dental students: a cross-sectional observational study

  • Emin Celalettin Ün

摘要

Background/objectives

The first clinical tooth extraction represents a pivotal and anxiety-provoking milestone in dental undergraduate education. The assessment of anxiety at this specific moment has important implications for curriculum design, student well-being, and patient safety. This study aimed to measure and characterise state and trait anxiety levels among fourth-year dental students performing tooth extraction on real patients for the first time.

Methods

A cross-sectional single-centre observational study was conducted at the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli University, Turkey. All 74 fourth-year dental students (49 female, 25 male) participating in the first compulsory clinical extraction session were invited to complete the State–Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). State anxiety (STAI-S) was assessed immediately before the extraction procedure; trait anxiety (STAI-T) was assessed during a regular, non-clinical lecture session. Descriptive statistics, a one-sample t-test, a paired-samples t-test, Pearson correlation analysis, and effect size calculations (Cohen’s d, 95% CIs) were performed.

Results

The mean STAI-S score immediately preceding the first extraction was 53.54 ± 6.17 (range 38–66), which was significantly higher than the theoretical midpoint of 50 (t = 4.937, df = 73, p < 0.001, Cohen’s d = 0.574). The mean STAI-T score was 40.16 ± 6.22 (range 28–51), consistent with commonly reported normative ranges for non-clinical adult populations. State anxiety scores were significantly higher than trait anxiety scores (paired t = 21.339, p < 0.001, Cohen’s d = 2.181). A moderate positive correlation was found between state and trait anxiety (r = 0.621, p < 0.001). Most students (81.1%) showed moderate state anxiety; 17.6% showed high state anxiety. No statistically significant gender difference was found in either STAI-S or STAI-T scores (p = 0.441 and p = 0.939, respectively).

Conclusion

Fourth-year dental students experience significantly elevated situational anxiety immediately prior to their first real-patient tooth extraction, suggesting that the observed elevation was predominantly related to the situational demands of the clinical encounter. These findings support the potential value of structured psychological preparation and progressive clinical exposure in undergraduate dental curricula to optimise both student welfare and patient care outcomes.