<p>This letter responds to the insightful concerns raised regarding our study on AI versus expert identification of cephalometric landmarks (Is automatic cephalometric software using artificial intelligence better than orthodontist experts in landmark identification? BMC Oral Health. 2023 Jul 8;23(1):467. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-03188-4">https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-03188-4</a>). We appreciate their constructive feedback and address the central criticisms below, specifically regarding image resolution, reproducibility, the manual-AI comparison, and data transparency. </p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Response to comments on AI cephalometric landmarking study

  • Huayu Ye,
  • Yongchao Gou

摘要

This letter responds to the insightful concerns raised regarding our study on AI versus expert identification of cephalometric landmarks (Is automatic cephalometric software using artificial intelligence better than orthodontist experts in landmark identification? BMC Oral Health. 2023 Jul 8;23(1):467. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-03188-4). We appreciate their constructive feedback and address the central criticisms below, specifically regarding image resolution, reproducibility, the manual-AI comparison, and data transparency.