Scholarlink

Purpose <p>The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the trueness and precision of digitally recorded maxillomandibular relationships obtained with two intraoral scanners (Trios 5 and Medit i600) at maximum intercuspal position (MIP) and at various protrusive–vertical mandibular positions.</p> Materials and methods <p>A dentate typodont mounted on a semi-adjustable articulator was positioned at MIP and at six experimental mandibular conditions (2&#xa0;V, 5&#xa0;V, 2P + 2&#xa0;V, 2P + 5&#xa0;V, 4P + 2&#xa0;V, and 4P + 5&#xa0;V). For each mandibular condition and scanner, one polyvinyl siloxane interocclusal record was produced. This record was then scanned 20 times under standardized digital and ambient conditions. A high-accuracy laboratory scanner (Redon Freedom UHD) was used to obtain reference datasets. Four linear distances (D1–D4) between reference markers were measured following marker-based best-fit alignment in Geomagic Control X. Trueness was defined as deviation from the reference measurements, and precision as the variability among repeated scans. Data were analyzed using two-way analysis of variance (α = 0.05), and effect sizes were calculated using partial eta squared (η²p).</p> Results <p>Mandibular position and scanner type were significantly associated with differences in trueness and precision (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.001). Certain vertically separated positions demonstrated lower trueness deviations compared with MIP, whereas protrusive positions showed scanner-dependent variations. A significant interaction was observed between scanner type and mandibular position (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.001).</p> Conclusions <p>Within the limitations of this in vitro study, mandibular position and scanner type were associated with variations in digital interocclusal recording performance.</p> Clinical relevance <p>Mandibular position and intraoral scanner selection may influence the accuracy of digital interocclusal records. Inaccuracies in digital bite registration may lead to occlusal discrepancies and require additional intraoral adjustments. Consideration of these factors may assist clinicians when performing digital bite registrations under altered mandibular conditions.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Accuracy of digital interocclusal records at various protrusive mandibular positions: an in vitro study

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年4月6日

查看全文
  • Handenur Ayalan,
  • Ahmet Atila Ertan

摘要

Purpose

The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the trueness and precision of digitally recorded maxillomandibular relationships obtained with two intraoral scanners (Trios 5 and Medit i600) at maximum intercuspal position (MIP) and at various protrusive–vertical mandibular positions.

Materials and methods

A dentate typodont mounted on a semi-adjustable articulator was positioned at MIP and at six experimental mandibular conditions (2 V, 5 V, 2P + 2 V, 2P + 5 V, 4P + 2 V, and 4P + 5 V). For each mandibular condition and scanner, one polyvinyl siloxane interocclusal record was produced. This record was then scanned 20 times under standardized digital and ambient conditions. A high-accuracy laboratory scanner (Redon Freedom UHD) was used to obtain reference datasets. Four linear distances (D1–D4) between reference markers were measured following marker-based best-fit alignment in Geomagic Control X. Trueness was defined as deviation from the reference measurements, and precision as the variability among repeated scans. Data were analyzed using two-way analysis of variance (α = 0.05), and effect sizes were calculated using partial eta squared (η²p).

Results

Mandibular position and scanner type were significantly associated with differences in trueness and precision (P < 0.001). Certain vertically separated positions demonstrated lower trueness deviations compared with MIP, whereas protrusive positions showed scanner-dependent variations. A significant interaction was observed between scanner type and mandibular position (P < 0.001).

Conclusions

Within the limitations of this in vitro study, mandibular position and scanner type were associated with variations in digital interocclusal recording performance.

Clinical relevance

Mandibular position and intraoral scanner selection may influence the accuracy of digital interocclusal records. Inaccuracies in digital bite registration may lead to occlusal discrepancies and require additional intraoral adjustments. Consideration of these factors may assist clinicians when performing digital bite registrations under altered mandibular conditions.