Background <p>Understanding the properties of dual-cure resin cements is essential for ensuring clinical success. The present study compared the pH, solubility, and radiopacity of the dual-cure resin cements NX3 Nexus<sup>®</sup> and Variolink N<sup>®</sup>.</p> Methods <p>This in vitro experimental study prepared 30 standardized dual-cure resin cement discs (8&#xa0;mm diameter × 1&#xa0;mm thickness). Discs were equally allocated to two groups (<i>n</i> = 15) —NX3 Nexus<sup>®</sup> and Variolink N<sup>®</sup>— and, within each cement, randomly assigned to three subgroups for pH, solubility, and radiopacity testing (<i>n</i> = 5 per subgroup). The non-parametric Mann–Whitney U test was employed for comparisons of solubility and pH, while the parametric Student’s t-test was employed for radiopacity. A significance level of <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05 was considered.</p> Results <p>Significant differences were observed between NX3 Nexus and Variolink N when comparing pH (<i>p</i> = 0.008) and radiopacity (<i>p</i> = 0.026). Both resin cements showed no differences when comparing solubility (<i>p</i> = 0.841).</p> Conclusion <p>Under the present in vitro conditions, NX3 Nexus<sup>®</sup> and Variolink N<sup>®</sup> demonstrated low solubility and comparable pH. Variolink N<sup>®</sup>’s higher radiopacity may aid radiographic detection of excess cement and marginal assessment; thus, it may be preferred when radiographic evaluation is critical, whereas either cement is appropriate otherwise.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

In vitro comparison of pH, solubility, and radiopacity of two dual-cure resin cements

  • Evelyn Aguirre-Gil,
  • Leonor Castro-Ramirez,
  • José Rosas-Díaz,
  • Enrique Yarasca-Berrocal,
  • José Huamani-Echaccaya,
  • Luis Cervantes-Ganoza,
  • César Cayo-Rojas

摘要

Background

Understanding the properties of dual-cure resin cements is essential for ensuring clinical success. The present study compared the pH, solubility, and radiopacity of the dual-cure resin cements NX3 Nexus® and Variolink N®.

Methods

This in vitro experimental study prepared 30 standardized dual-cure resin cement discs (8 mm diameter × 1 mm thickness). Discs were equally allocated to two groups (n = 15) —NX3 Nexus® and Variolink N®— and, within each cement, randomly assigned to three subgroups for pH, solubility, and radiopacity testing (n = 5 per subgroup). The non-parametric Mann–Whitney U test was employed for comparisons of solubility and pH, while the parametric Student’s t-test was employed for radiopacity. A significance level of p < 0.05 was considered.

Results

Significant differences were observed between NX3 Nexus and Variolink N when comparing pH (p = 0.008) and radiopacity (p = 0.026). Both resin cements showed no differences when comparing solubility (p = 0.841).

Conclusion

Under the present in vitro conditions, NX3 Nexus® and Variolink N® demonstrated low solubility and comparable pH. Variolink N®’s higher radiopacity may aid radiographic detection of excess cement and marginal assessment; thus, it may be preferred when radiographic evaluation is critical, whereas either cement is appropriate otherwise.