Background <p>This in vitro study aimed to investigate the accuracy of a modified scanning technique that incorporated a simple scan aid (SSA) and a novel scanning pattern (segmented scanning pattern, SSP) for complete-arch implant scan.</p> Methods <p>An edentulous maxillary stone cast with 4 parallel analogs was used as the master model. 10 scans were performed with an intraoral scanner (Trios3) using different scanning methods: a conventional scanning pattern (CSP) without SSA (Group I), CSP with SSA (Group II), SSP with SSA (Group III) and conventional splinted open-tray impression (Group IV). The reference scan was obtained by digitizing the master model using a dental laboratory scanner. The related files were imported into inspection software for trueness and precision assessment. One-way ANOVA, Kruskal-Wallis, SNK-<i>q</i> and Bonferroni test were used to evaluate the values. The level of significance was set at α=0.05.</p> Results <p>For the overall accuracy assessment (trueness and precision), group I exhibited the largest linear and angular deviation (<i>p</i>&lt;0.001) followed by group II (<i>p</i>&lt;0.001). For local accuracy assessment, all intraoral scan bodies (ISB A, B, C, and D) exhibited smaller linear and angular deviations in group III (<i>p</i>&lt;0.05) and group IV (<i>p</i>&lt;0.05) than that in group I. No differences were found between group III and IV (<i>p</i>&gt;0.05), either in the overall accuracy or local accuracy assessment.</p> Conclusions <p>SSA combined with SSP could significantly improve the accuracy of complete-arch digital implant impressions.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Effect of a modified scanning technique on the accuracy of complete-arch implant scanning: an in vitro study

  • Luming Wei,
  • Jianhua Ji,
  • Xuzhe Zha,
  • Changyong Yuan,
  • Penglai Wang

摘要

Background

This in vitro study aimed to investigate the accuracy of a modified scanning technique that incorporated a simple scan aid (SSA) and a novel scanning pattern (segmented scanning pattern, SSP) for complete-arch implant scan.

Methods

An edentulous maxillary stone cast with 4 parallel analogs was used as the master model. 10 scans were performed with an intraoral scanner (Trios3) using different scanning methods: a conventional scanning pattern (CSP) without SSA (Group I), CSP with SSA (Group II), SSP with SSA (Group III) and conventional splinted open-tray impression (Group IV). The reference scan was obtained by digitizing the master model using a dental laboratory scanner. The related files were imported into inspection software for trueness and precision assessment. One-way ANOVA, Kruskal-Wallis, SNK-q and Bonferroni test were used to evaluate the values. The level of significance was set at α=0.05.

Results

For the overall accuracy assessment (trueness and precision), group I exhibited the largest linear and angular deviation (p<0.001) followed by group II (p<0.001). For local accuracy assessment, all intraoral scan bodies (ISB A, B, C, and D) exhibited smaller linear and angular deviations in group III (p<0.05) and group IV (p<0.05) than that in group I. No differences were found between group III and IV (p>0.05), either in the overall accuracy or local accuracy assessment.

Conclusions

SSA combined with SSP could significantly improve the accuracy of complete-arch digital implant impressions.